![]() |
|
|
|
|
#1 |
|
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Ann Arbor, MI
Posts: 5,503
|
And here are fire strikers. One grasps one branch and strikes with the other. There were multiple other forms, but the principle remained the same. Some are dirt simple, some are very artistic.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Ann Arbor, MI
Posts: 5,503
|
To summarize :
Sword hanger hooks were built in two separate planes, mostly perpendicular to each other. The “Jeb” Stuart’s one is an exception and requires chains because of that. Fire strikers were built as a single plane. |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Member
Join Date: Sep 2012
Posts: 471
|
I'm with Ariel. It is certainly a flint striker.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Member
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 1,307
|
Just information regarding the item in #11.
That's actually a typical Javanese reins holder. |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Ann Arbor, MI
Posts: 5,503
|
Quote:
It is certainly possible that these hooks might have been used as rein holders in Indonesia: they will work. But as a rule, reins were held in place simply by putting them over the saddle pommel. This may be one of the reasons why Islamic saddles had tall pommels. Here are Central Asian, Turkish and Afghani saddles. But going back to the original thingamajig, it simply could not work as a sword or reins holder: engineering would not allow for it. Last edited by ariel; 7th May 2021 at 05:04 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Ann Arbor, MI
Posts: 5,503
|
And here is a Ukrainian ( Turkish style) one.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Member
Join Date: Dec 2019
Location: Eastern Sierra
Posts: 518
|
My immediate impression when I saw the picture was a striker. After reading this thread I still think so, but with less conviction after seeing other possible uses. Could we see the aspect that is facing away in post #8? That would be the area of contact IMHO. I like that it would seem to direct the flint away from the knuckles.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 1,307
|
Quote:
Just - the particular item shown in #11 has nothing to do with Cossacks, India, and the region between them. It comes from specific region and had specific purpose, which has nothing to do with the purpose you described to it. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Ann Arbor, MI
Posts: 5,503
|
You are correct: Alan’s example has nothing to do with Cossacks, India etc.
However, engineeringly it is a carbon copy of an item in post #22, that belonged to Zaporozhian ( Ukrainian) cossacks that they in turn copied from Turkish examples. The Indonesians just did not need a belt hook hanger: they carried their weapons either tucked under the belt or hung on a baldrick over the shoulder. I am unaware of Javanese weapons with suspension fittings and rings on the scabbards. Most likely they just took an item from some foreigners and used it for their own purpose. |
|
|
|
![]() |
|
|