![]() |
|
![]() |
#1 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Ann Arbor, MI
Posts: 5,503
|
![]()
It depends on your definition of “ deceive”.
Somebody might have made ( or ordered) it for private use as a hunting knife . Then it went from hands to hands and the original story was forgotten. Advertising this knife as Central Asian to get more money would be a deceit. Selling it as a curiosity or relying on the description by the previous “deceiver” would be just ignorance. There is nothing Central Asian here. Showing examples of other daggers of unknown provenance does not help: this is a usable knife composed of unrelated parts by somebody who was just attributionally ignorant or just didn’ t give a dam ( sic!) about authenticity. Walking stick handle is a good possibility, especially with cheap round glass “stones” on the top. But, in the immortal words of “ Forged in Fire” , “ It will ke-e- ell” :-) |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Member
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Russia
Posts: 1,042
|
![]()
I agree with ariel. My opinion is that the item is assembled from three parts (quite possibly a long time ago). The scabbard is undoubtedly made in Central Asia. The hilt and blade have nothing to do with Central Asia. I think аriel is right in suggesting that the handle could be part of the cane.
It would be ideal to match this very good sheath with an old Central Asian pichak knife. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Member
Join Date: Jun 2020
Location: Germany
Posts: 255
|
![]()
Hello,
I'm also largely agree with your comments. Of course we can't clarify every detail of the history of my dagger but ariel constructed a plausible version. The hilt looks still caucasian to me because of the papakha. Yes, the scabbard would be a very good replacement part for a central asian Bichak, but I dont have any ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Member
Join Date: Oct 2015
Posts: 147
|
![]()
For me, this is an absolutely Ottoman scabbard made by a master from Dagestan. After the annexation of the territories of the North Caucasus to the Russian Empire in 1865 and before the start of the First World War, the Islamic population of the North Caucasus actively migrated to the Ottoman Empire. This migration was much more massive and prolonged than the migration to Central Asia and received the name "Caucasian muhajirism".
The narrow form of the scabbard and, especially, the absolutely Ottoman form of the end of the scabbard tell me that the Ottoman bichaq lived in them, and not the Central Asian pchak. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
Member
Join Date: Oct 2015
Posts: 147
|
![]()
... or Ottoman Kard
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Ann Arbor, MI
Posts: 5,503
|
![]()
Agree.
It raises yet another digression. South Georgia and Northern Anatolia had a signigicant number of islamized Georgians ( besides Lazes), the so -called Meskheti Turks. In 1944 more than 100,000 of them were expelled to Central Asia to prevent their potential (!) espionage, collaboration with the Turks and other anti-Soviet activities. In general, the usual Soviet paranoia about “disloyal nations”. Likely there were a few jewelers among them:-). In that case the scabbard could date from 1950s or even later. That might be the reason why Kwiatek found translation strangely “Caucasian”. I wonder whether the origins of the peculiar throat of the scabbard might be found in the construction of local knives. Otherwise, I have difficulty to imagine how the entire thing functioned: there must have been an uncovered upper part of the edge. 50:50 chance that every time the owner tried to pull the kard/bichak ( ?) out he needed a Band-Aid:-) Last edited by ariel; 8th March 2021 at 05:06 PM. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
Member
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Russia
Posts: 1,042
|
![]()
It would be interesting to see a Ottoman knife in a scabbard of the same decor. Unfortunately, I am not aware of such samples. But, probably, Ariel and Saracen will demonstrate such items.
In the 1940s, in the republics of Soviet Central Asia did not make knives in silver sheaths. The tradition of making elements of national knives in Central Asia from silver ended at the end of the 1920s. Of course the inscription is "strangely Caucasian". As I wrote earlier, similar scabbards in Central Asia were made by masters who moved from the Caucasus to Bukhara and Khiva. I don't understand why these fantasies about the Meskhetian Turks are needed? Information that Caucasian jewelers worked in the late 19th - early 20th centuries in the khanates of Central Asia is in scientific sources. Information about the mythical "jewelers of the Meskhetian Turks" - Mr. Ariel's fantasies, which are not confirmed by any facts. Last edited by mahratt; 8th March 2021 at 05:08 PM. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 | |
Member
Join Date: Oct 2015
Posts: 147
|
![]() Quote:
Last edited by Saracen; 8th March 2021 at 10:22 PM. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|