![]() |
|
![]() |
#1 | |
Member
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Russia
Posts: 1,042
|
![]() Quote:
But, in Caucasus, I cannot remember knives of such a shape that would fit this scabbard ... But in Central Asia there are such knives ![]() By the way, I think from the knives that I showed in the photo against the background of the carpet, there is no question that their scabbard is from Central Asia? |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 | |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2019
Location: Eastern Sierra
Posts: 497
|
![]() Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 | |
Member
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Russia
Posts: 1,042
|
![]() Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Ann Arbor, MI
Posts: 5,503
|
![]()
There were famous Bakhmud and Abdalla Tubchiev brothers who went to Central Asian khanates ( Bukhara, I vaguely remember) at the end of 19 century. They worked there as jewelers. In Central Asia they learned enameling techniques and brought it back to the Caucasus. In exchange they taught the locals Caucasian silverwork and niello.
They also worked for several years in Istanbul. Both died when the Caucasus became “ Soviet” and all those years they made enameled scabbards and handles for the local and “ Moscow” bonzas. Thus, this kindjal is very, very highly likely can be dated to the beginning of the 20th century or even later. It is almost always the itinerant masters who introduce new techniques, decoration motives, materials etc. Just like Persian bladesmiths at the Moghul court who taught their Indian colleagues how to forge fancy wootz patterns instead of the customary “salt and pepper” one. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Ann Arbor, MI
Posts: 5,503
|
![]()
I have a strange feeling about it.
The face is peculiar, Central Asia was and still is Islamic. Even drawings of human faces are frown upon, but this is a 3-dimensional sculpture. Usually ( Hungarian, Philippine, Mughal etc) face is turned toward the edge. Here it faces the spine. There is a rivet through golden koft decorations. And why on Earth would anybody put a fragment of European regulation blade into a Caucasian / Turkish kard scabbard? I usually try to find positive things to say. Here I find one strange feature after another. Could it be a composition of unrelated parts? |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
Member
Join Date: Jun 2020
Location: Germany
Posts: 255
|
![]()
Hello,
I think it is a regional work. Central Asia sounds likely to me, as some members confirmed. But that is a debatable point, because it looks like a marriage/composition. I'm agree with that, ariel. But all parts except the blade are of a central asian or maybe caucasian origin (in my opinion) and I don't think it was made in the western world. Daggers from Central Asia were shown, which are made of recycled parts, too. This and some Bichaks with similar scabbards are arguments for this region. What is your guess were and why it was made? In every case it wasn't made recently to deceive anyone. The seller was no collector and the price was (very) moderate ![]() Regards Robin Last edited by Gonzoadler; 5th March 2021 at 08:39 PM. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Ann Arbor, MI
Posts: 5,503
|
![]()
It depends on your definition of “ deceive”.
Somebody might have made ( or ordered) it for private use as a hunting knife . Then it went from hands to hands and the original story was forgotten. Advertising this knife as Central Asian to get more money would be a deceit. Selling it as a curiosity or relying on the description by the previous “deceiver” would be just ignorance. There is nothing Central Asian here. Showing examples of other daggers of unknown provenance does not help: this is a usable knife composed of unrelated parts by somebody who was just attributionally ignorant or just didn’ t give a dam ( sic!) about authenticity. Walking stick handle is a good possibility, especially with cheap round glass “stones” on the top. But, in the immortal words of “ Forged in Fire” , “ It will ke-e- ell” :-) |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|