![]() |
|
![]() |
#1 | |
Member
Join Date: Mar 2017
Posts: 445
|
![]() Quote:
![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Member
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: Austria
Posts: 1,906
|
![]()
Indeed they appear to be Peri, but what about the two inscriptions?
It may be they shed more light on the subject. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 | |
Member
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Russia
Posts: 1,042
|
![]() Quote:
"Oh Kind!" (usually an appeal to Allah). Year 1250 (1255?) |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 | |
Member
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: Austria
Posts: 1,906
|
![]() Quote:
![]() To my eyes looks definitely like Qajar 1250/1834 (or less likely 1205/1790), but I wanted to hear first other opinions as I wasn't very confident in my Nasta'liq date reading competency. ![]() Also the very aesthetical style of decorations appears to be right for that period. Let us wait to see if my friend will find a fitting explanation for the carvings. Meanwhile, it would also be nice to see a little more detail of the wootz pattern. PS: I don't believe it is 1255 because it is a big difference between the supposedly 5 - ٥ and the 0 - ٠ in the carving. Last edited by mariusgmioc; 2nd February 2021 at 09:46 AM. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
Member
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Germany
Posts: 197
|
![]()
[QUOTE=mariusgmioc]Thank you Mahratt!
![]() To my eyes looks definitely like Qajar 1250/1834 (or less likely 1205/1790), but I wanted to hear first other opinions as I wasn't very confident in my Nasta'liq date reading competency. ![]() Also the very aesthetical style of decorations appears to be right for that period. Let us wait to see if my friend will find a fitting explanation for the carvings. Meanwhile, it would also be nice to see a little more detail of the wootz pattern. PS: I don't believe it is 1255 because it is a big difference between the supposedly 5 - ٥ and the 0 - ٠ in the carving. [IMwootz pattern. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
Member
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: Austria
Posts: 1,906
|
![]()
Yes, this is crystalline wootz pattern, rather typical for 19th century Persian blades.
So to me, everything in this dagger is consistent with the possible date of 1834. Also the scabbard appears to be the original. Very, very nice piece! ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 | |
Member
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Germany
Posts: 197
|
![]() Quote:
1255 that would be = 1839 |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|