![]() |
|
![]() |
#1 |
Member
Join Date: Apr 2017
Posts: 67
|
![]()
Fair point, Victrix.
I can now confirm that whatever the image may be -- numerals or a graphic -- it was not made by a stamp. Close inspection with a high-power loupe shows the edges are slightly undercut, which could only mean that they were incised rather than stamped. Comparing the felddegen to other similar examples, it seems the blade on this example is more narrow across the ricasso (27.5 mm/1.1 inches) than most. Could that be a clue as to its age? If a wider blade equates to an older weapon, perhaps this one is a later transitional piece? |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Member
Join Date: Apr 2017
Location: Sweden
Posts: 755
|
![]()
Given the modest length and probable stiffness of the blade it is likely an infantryman’s sword. It would be used for close quarter fighting and need thrust and well as cut capabilities. It looks like a 17thC felddegen. I would not rule out that the sword continued to be used into 18thC when the armoury number might have been added (town/castle guard sidearm?). I love these swords with the auspicious number and running wolf on the blade.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|