![]() |
|
![]() |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
|
![]() |
#1 |
Vikingsword Staff
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: The Aussie Bush
Posts: 4,361
|
![]()
Miloglow360,
Thanks for posting about this interesting article. We like to credit the original authors of the works we cite, so here is the relevant citation: Park J-S, Rajan K, Ramesh R. High-carbon steel and ancient sword-making as observed in a double-edged sword from an Iron Age megalithic burial in Tamil Nadu, India. Archaeometry 62:68–80, 2020. (available online here) I have attached larger images of the sword, which appear as Figure 1 in this article and have the following description. Figure 1. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Member
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Moscow, Russia
Posts: 426
|
![]()
Very interesting, thanks. But, unfortunately, there is not so clear with the definition of the time period. In the case of the definition time of the burial ground, the author refers to his own articles, and radiocarbon analysis shows only delirium.
![]() I'm sure this is an absolutely reliable study, but in some questions we need to be careful. https://frontline.thehindu.com/cover...le30255049.ece ![]() https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Indigenous_Aryans ![]() Last edited by Mercenary; 1st August 2020 at 02:50 PM. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 | |
Member
Join Date: Jul 2020
Posts: 18
|
![]() Quote:
If it's a megalithic culture of S. India it's pretty old. Crucible steel production is known in early on S. India and Sri Lanka. Just not in the manufacturing of something like a sword however, until now. Recently they found a iron dagger, riveted copper hilt as well. With sheets of metal riveted together to form the hilt. The first one is a recently found copper hilt with rivets. The rest are from an early dagger found dating 6th century BC without rivets, but similar hilt design. https://punemirror.indiatimes.com/pu...w/68339114.cms The hilt design is old as seen from the 2nd-1st Century BC warriors. I havent seen the hilt design again after 1st Century AD+, at least not in India. Last edited by Milogow360; 2nd August 2020 at 09:51 AM. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Member
Join Date: Jul 2020
Posts: 18
|
![]()
This might be interesting to some as well. Early Iron weapons are showing up in megalithic sites in the South. It's currently a developing topic.
The hilt design in one of the swords has a similar shape to the daggers above, and the relief, statue already posted. “Even as the survey had begun for excavation, the Centre has decided to set up a museum at Adichanallur at least now, which would tell the world about the ancientness of Tamils and their civilisation. The carbon dating conducted on the products recovered from this site in Florida labs had proved that it was at least 2,900-year-old civilization. If the excavations are done properly, the world will be surprised to see how advanced ancient Tamils’ life was,” says Mr. Kamarasu. https://www.thehindu.com/news/nation...le30716873.ece Carbon dating of samples excavated from the Adichanallur site in Thoothukudi district has revealed that they belonged to the period between 905 BC and 696 BC. The March 18, 2019, carbon dating report of samples that were sent to Beta Analytic Testing Laboratory, USA, was submitted to the Madurai Bench of the Madras High Court on Thursday. https://www.thehindu.com/news/cities...le26737779.ece Last edited by Milogow360; 2nd August 2020 at 11:43 AM. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
Member
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Moscow, Russia
Posts: 426
|
![]()
Thank you again. But the question is how old are weapons made of high-carbon steel. Ultra-high-carbon steel. Forged into a long sword.
Last edited by Mercenary; 2nd August 2020 at 03:12 PM. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 | |
Member
Join Date: Jul 2020
Posts: 18
|
![]() Quote:
The other megalithic dagger examples I gave with hilts designs that are classical as well. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
Member
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Moscow, Russia
Posts: 426
|
![]()
Oops... I got it. The sword was found by a non-archaeologist (one of the authors - R. Ramesh) at the bottom of some "pit" without any research of this pit itself or the accompanying material (we were only told about "an urn enclosed with a capstone"). But since the megalithic burials in this area "dated to the sixth century BCE or earlier" so this pit was dated to 6th century BCE too. How graceful.
![]() The article does not meet the standards of scientific archaeological research, although one of the authors (K. Rajan) is a respected archaeologist. Just pit, just sword, just an archaeologist-enthusiast, but as result we have the oldest sword made of wootz. Just very sad. Hope I am wrong. ![]() Last edited by Mercenary; 2nd August 2020 at 05:58 PM. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|