Ethnographic Arms & Armour
 

Go Back   Ethnographic Arms & Armour > Discussion Forums > Ethnographic Weapons
FAQ Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old 27th July 2020, 10:27 PM   #1
Ian
Vikingsword Staff
 
Ian's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: The Aussie Bush
Posts: 4,361
Default

Miloglow360,

Thanks for posting about this interesting article. We like to credit the original authors of the works we cite, so here is the relevant citation:

Park J-S, Rajan K, Ramesh R. High-carbon steel and ancient sword-making as observed in a double-edged sword from an Iron Age megalithic burial in Tamil Nadu, India. Archaeometry 62:68–80, 2020. (available online here)

I have attached larger images of the sword, which appear as Figure 1 in this article and have the following description.
Figure 1
General appearance of the double‐edged iron sword under investigation: (a) general appearance, where arrows locate the spots from which specimens were taken for metallographic examination; (b, c) magnified view of the tip and the body, respectively; and (d, e) magnified views of the hilt.
.
Attached Images
 
Ian is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 1st August 2020, 02:17 PM   #2
Mercenary
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Moscow, Russia
Posts: 426
Default

Very interesting, thanks. But, unfortunately, there is not so clear with the definition of the time period. In the case of the definition time of the burial ground, the author refers to his own articles, and radiocarbon analysis shows only delirium.

I'm sure this is an absolutely reliable study, but in some questions we need to be careful.

https://frontline.thehindu.com/cover...le30255049.ece
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Indigenous_Aryans

Last edited by Mercenary; 1st August 2020 at 02:50 PM.
Mercenary is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2nd August 2020, 06:10 AM   #3
Milogow360
Member
 
Milogow360's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2020
Posts: 18
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mercenary
Very interesting, thanks. But, unfortunately, there is not so clear with the definition of the time period. In the case of the definition time of the burial ground, the author refers to his own articles, and radiocarbon analysis shows only delirium.

I'm sure this is an absolutely reliable study, but in some questions we need to be careful.

https://frontline.thehindu.com/cover...le30255049.ece
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Indigenous_Aryans

If it's a megalithic culture of S. India it's pretty old. Crucible steel production is known in early on S. India and Sri Lanka. Just not in the manufacturing of something like a sword however, until now.

Recently they found a iron dagger, riveted copper hilt as well. With sheets of metal riveted together to form the hilt.

The first one is a recently found copper hilt with rivets. The rest are from an early dagger found dating 6th century BC without rivets, but similar hilt design.

https://punemirror.indiatimes.com/pu...w/68339114.cms

The hilt design is old as seen from the 2nd-1st Century BC warriors. I havent seen the hilt design again after 1st Century AD+, at least not in India.
Attached Images
      

Last edited by Milogow360; 2nd August 2020 at 09:51 AM.
Milogow360 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2nd August 2020, 08:11 AM   #4
Milogow360
Member
 
Milogow360's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2020
Posts: 18
Default

This might be interesting to some as well. Early Iron weapons are showing up in megalithic sites in the South. It's currently a developing topic.

The hilt design in one of the swords has a similar shape to the daggers above, and the relief, statue already posted.

“Even as the survey had begun for excavation, the Centre has decided to set up a museum at Adichanallur at least now, which would tell the world about the ancientness of Tamils and their civilisation. The carbon dating conducted on the products recovered from this site in Florida labs had proved that it was at least 2,900-year-old civilization. If the excavations are done properly, the world will be surprised to see how advanced ancient Tamils’ life was,” says Mr. Kamarasu.


https://www.thehindu.com/news/nation...le30716873.ece

Carbon dating of samples excavated from the Adichanallur site in Thoothukudi district has revealed that they belonged to the period between 905 BC and 696 BC.

The March 18, 2019, carbon dating report of samples that were sent to Beta Analytic Testing Laboratory, USA, was submitted to the Madurai Bench of the Madras High Court on Thursday.

https://www.thehindu.com/news/cities...le26737779.ece
Attached Images
     

Last edited by Milogow360; 2nd August 2020 at 11:43 AM.
Milogow360 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2nd August 2020, 12:04 PM   #5
Mercenary
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Moscow, Russia
Posts: 426
Default

Thank you again. But the question is how old are weapons made of high-carbon steel. Ultra-high-carbon steel. Forged into a long sword.

Last edited by Mercenary; 2nd August 2020 at 03:12 PM.
Mercenary is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2nd August 2020, 12:13 PM   #6
Milogow360
Member
 
Milogow360's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2020
Posts: 18
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mercenary
Thank you again. But the question is how old are weapons made of high-carbon steel. Ultra-high-carbon steel. Forged into long sword.
The site of that place is around 6th century BC as mentioned in the article. Several megalithic sites in the South are dated around that time.

The other megalithic dagger examples I gave with hilts designs that are classical as well.
Milogow360 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2nd August 2020, 03:14 PM   #7
Mercenary
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Moscow, Russia
Posts: 426
Default

Oops... I got it. The sword was found by a non-archaeologist (one of the authors - R. Ramesh) at the bottom of some "pit" without any research of this pit itself or the accompanying material (we were only told about "an urn enclosed with a capstone"). But since the megalithic burials in this area "dated to the sixth century BCE or earlier" so this pit was dated to 6th century BCE too. How graceful.
The article does not meet the standards of scientific archaeological research, although one of the authors (K. Rajan) is a respected archaeologist. Just pit, just sword, just an archaeologist-enthusiast, but as result we have the oldest sword made of wootz.
Just very sad. Hope I am wrong.

Last edited by Mercenary; 2nd August 2020 at 05:58 PM.
Mercenary is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 10:44 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Posts are regarded as being copyrighted by their authors and the act of posting material is deemed to be a granting of an irrevocable nonexclusive license for display here.