Ethnographic Arms & Armour
 

Go Back   Ethnographic Arms & Armour > Discussion Forums > Ethnographic Weapons
FAQ Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old 30th March 2020, 12:57 AM   #1
MacCathain
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2017
Posts: 68
Default

I'm pleased my inquiry led to the sharing of the great information in this thread. Thanks to all of you who replied.

Any additional thoughts as to the holes in the dog's cheek? It doesn't seem to be a common feature, though there are one or two examples shown in the related threads. Perhaps evidence of the existence of a "retention strap ring" is a clue to age?

M
MacCathain is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 30th March 2020, 09:11 AM   #2
Sajen
Member
 
Sajen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Germany, Dortmund
Posts: 9,207
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by MacCathain
Any additional thoughts as to the holes in the dog's cheek? It doesn't seem to be a common feature, though there are one or two examples shown in the related threads. Perhaps evidence of the existence of a "retention strap ring" is a clue to age?
Hello MacCathain,

The last shown sword in post #8 has the holes as well. I've seen them mostly by dinahong-palay and sinampalok, see here: http://www.vikingsword.com/vb/showth...ighlight=bicol
I think they are not deep enough for rentention strap ring, but maybe a sign of age, newer ones seems to have this holes.

Regards,
Detlef
Sajen is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 30th March 2020, 09:28 AM   #3
kai
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 3,255
Question

I assume the larger hole in your hilt goes through completely? Then there seems to be a high probability that a retention strap (or a cord holding such a piece of cloth) ran through it. I doubt it has seen a lot of service though.

The example shown in post #8 also seems to have a similar hole; I can't remember any with typical minasbad though.

Based on the quite rare occurrence and apparent differences in age, I'd be inclined to vote for personal preference rather than indictors for age/origin.

BTW, the smaller holes indicate losses of decor.

Regards,
Kai
kai is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 30th March 2020, 09:29 AM   #4
kai
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 3,255
Red face

Detlef typed faster again...
kai is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 31st March 2020, 05:06 PM   #5
MacCathain
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2017
Posts: 68
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by kai
I assume the larger hole in your hilt goes through completely?
The holes don't go all the way through . . . both are about 7 mm deep. There's no evidence of wear on the inside of either one.
MacCathain is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 31st March 2020, 06:41 PM   #6
Sajen
Member
 
Sajen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Germany, Dortmund
Posts: 9,207
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by MacCathain
The holes don't go all the way through . . . both are about 7 mm deep. There's no evidence of wear on the inside of either one.
Like said, I think that this holes are pure decorative, I've seen them mainly by examples from WWII or later.

Regards,
Detlef
Sajen is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 01:01 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Posts are regarded as being copyrighted by their authors and the act of posting material is deemed to be a granting of an irrevocable nonexclusive license for display here.