![]() |
|
![]() |
#1 |
Member
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: The Netherlands
Posts: 200
|
![]()
I just found this photograph of the top end of a hilt (not mine unfortunately).
The hilt is of a North Sumatran sewar. It also has clear resemblences. ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Member
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Wisconsin, USA
Posts: 415
|
![]()
I concur with the earlier comments regarding the filigree: Burma.
Regarding the hilt, compare it with this one in my collection. The sword originates from a Dutch colonial collection. I acquired it from a well-known collector who specializes in this region. The blade is pattern-welded with a nice linear pamor. A single fuller extends along the spine of the blade until the blade narrows towards the tip. The blade is 6.7mm thick at the base with a length of 585mm. The hilt features silver work (no filigree) with a small bit of damage on the left side. The horn pommel is interpreted as a stylized clenched fist. This is a rare but not unknown motif from the eastern side of Sumatra. Alternatively, it may also be a stylized hulu iku ite. The overall length (OAL) is 735mm. The sword is heavy in comparison with other pedangs, weighing 727g (1 lb 9.6 oz) |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 | |
Vikingsword Staff
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: The Aussie Bush
Posts: 4,361
|
![]() Quote:
Ian. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Member
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 3,255
|
![]()
Hello Albert,
I'd like to see more closeups of the blade (even if it is rather plain) and both sides of the hilt. Dimensions would be good to have, especially width and thickness of the blade! From the short gripping area as well as the strongly down-curving pommel, I'd be inclined to believe it comes from Sulawesi; the fairly wide blade is not really typical though. Is it from mono steel? Another option could be the Banjar/Negara melting pot with pretty down-curving pommels (apparently based on Sulawesi styles, anyway). I haven't seen any carved like this though. The Sumatran hulu iku ite does not turn down that much. The scabbard is certainly weird. I believe that the silver is a later colonial replacement, probably done on Java (Sunda or workshops around Yogyakarta have been doing silverwork for other regions for quite some time); it is possible that the silversmith was second-guessing at Sumatra, too. Regards, Kai |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 | |
Member
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: The Netherlands
Posts: 200
|
![]() Quote:
Length blade: 50.5 cm Width blade: 40 - 42 mm Thickness blade (near the hilt): 6 mm More photos will follow. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 | |
Member
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 3,255
|
![]()
Hello Albert,
Quote:
That's a longer and wider blade than expected (by me); a bit on the thin side though. The blade might be laminated - difficult to verify due to the corrosion; I can't make out any pamor which could have helped to narrow down the origin. Can you make out any differences in silver quality between the ferrule (with the ellipsoid motif) vs any other parts (especially with filigree and possibly also the cap of the hilt at the base of the blade? I'd be inclined to stick with my vote for Sulawesi (pommel and possibly blade); my guess would be that (most of) the silver work is modern though. Regards, Kai |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
Member
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: The Netherlands
Posts: 200
|
![]()
Thank you all for your valuable input!
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 |
Vikingsword Staff
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: The Aussie Bush
Posts: 4,361
|
![]()
Albert, did you reach a final conclusion?
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|