![]() |
|
![]() |
#1 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Ann Arbor, MI
Posts: 5,503
|
![]()
Charles,
Alternatively, it was a shamshir to start with, with replaced handle and suspension rings put upside down. This can explain the slit on the throat in a "wrong" i.e. reverse location. This was very unusual, if not unseen, on pseudo-shashkas, but necessary for highly curved shamshirs. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Arms Historian
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Route 66
Posts: 10,281
|
![]()
This is a magnificent shashka!! and with this blade even more exciting.
As Charles well notes, this is one of the Persian trade blades with the Assad Allah cartouche and lion pictograph with the calligraphy panel. These blades are well described in Oliver Pinchot's article of 2002 in "Arms Collecting" (Vo. 40, #1, February). As Elgood has noted these blades along with Caucasian blades entered the Arabian sphere, as well as their being found in India and other spheres receiving such trade blades. I have a Bedouin sabre with this same blade form, but much shallower curve. That is what is so unusual and more attractive on this particular example is the more parabolic blade than usually seen with these Persian trade blades. With Ottoman kilij ofcourse, the deep parabolic blade has the slit opening in the throat of the scabbard to allow passage of the blade exiting the scabbard. It is most unusual to see this on the reverse carry which is a Caucasian affinity for the draw cut in sort of 'quick draw' style. While a bit of an anomaly, it is fantastic! I have actually never seen a shamshir with one of these blades, at least per se'. It seems most I have seen are in various local hilt forms as noted with use of these trade blades. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Member
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: Austria
Posts: 1,911
|
![]()
I tend to agree with Ariel.
This is an original Persian shamshir converted into a Shashka. The scabbard also appears to be the original one, modified for the new purpose. But, this is my speculation... ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Ann Arbor, MI
Posts: 5,503
|
![]()
Marius,
Easy to check. Shamshirs have tangs arising from the middle of the blade. Here it arises from the side. X-Ray the handle and look for additional holes. I am also a little bit spooked by the 5th pic from the top: the big fitting with the suspension ring seems to be somewhat out of alignment with the leather. At the end of the day it is immaterial: even if the scabbard and the handle were reworked, it was done during active life of the sword. But still would be interesting: no matter when and how, but the slit at the throat is on the wrong side of the scabbard. It is not a fake by any standard; at the worst case it was a major modification. Last edited by ariel; 26th September 2019 at 09:46 AM. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 | |
Member
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Russia
Posts: 1,042
|
![]() Quote:
Marius, I would agree with you. But! As you can see in the first photo, the handle of this shashka is very deeply hidden in scabbard. So I think that the master made these scabbard specifically for this shashka ![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 | |
Member
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: Austria
Posts: 1,911
|
![]() Quote:
![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 | |
Member
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Russia
Posts: 1,042
|
![]() Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 | |
Member
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: Austria
Posts: 1,911
|
![]() Quote:
You are probably right as the scabbard for a shamshir would only have a slot for the blade and would not fit a hilt. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|