![]() |
![]() |
#19 |
Member
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Russia
Posts: 1,042
|
![]()
Probably, I incomprehensibly explained
![]() https://www.ebay.com/itm/ANCIEN-COUT...wAAOSwx0FdZCQw This choora dagger, judging by the description, is declared as ancient. Beautiful floral carving on a blade is a modern work. I will explain again what I wrote a little earlier. If the old master made this carving, he would decorate the T-shaped spine this choora dagger in the same style. The photo shows that the T-shaped spine this choora dagger is decorated very roughly. Old masters did not allow such stylistic differences. So we are dealing with a fake ... As I said before, there are fakes of a very good standard ![]() I didn’t say anything about the hilt ![]() For me personally, modern work (in my understanding "modern work" for an object that is 100 years old is 10-30-50 years old) on an old blade (even if it will be very good) - reduces the value of the item ... For me, such an object will be fake. Marius, I agree with you that Japanese swords are usually made by a master swordsmith and occasionaly decorated/engraved (horimono), sometimes at a much later date by another master. That doesn't make them fakes, nor does it decrease their value. But if I make an engraving on an old Japanese blade - what do you say about this?)) Will it be a fake? ![]() Last edited by mahratt; 11th September 2019 at 09:34 PM. |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|