![]() |
|
![]() |
#1 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2014
Posts: 143
|
![]()
Here are a few more pictures , i will clean the blade up a little soon but how far do you go , is it ok and wise to clean the blade up , i can sand it down untill its shining or should i leave it in its antique state ?
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Vikingsword Staff
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: The Aussie Bush
Posts: 4,361
|
![]()
Hi chief:
All of the quality examples I have seen in collections or museums have had a well polished blade. In the original culture, an antique and important blade such as this would have been polished well and most likely etched. At the very least you need to remove the active rust, such as present on the tang. Your latest pics suggest to me that this sword did not have any asang asang during its life (at least, I see no evidence of such) which might also argue for an older transitional piece. Congrats on another fine addition to your collection. Ian |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2014
Posts: 143
|
![]()
Hi Ian
Thanks for your help and guidance , once ive cleaned it up i will then be looking for a suitable hilt , i guess this will be quite difficult but surely not impossible to find , regards chief |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Vikingsword Staff
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 6,336
|
![]()
Is the tang round?
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2014
Posts: 143
|
![]()
Hi rick , yes the tang is round
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
Member
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 3,255
|
![]()
I'm having the same thoughts as Gustav - I'm far from sure this blade really is Moro. Some features may well point to the Jawa-Bali nexus. I need to dig into this in more detail..
Not all archaic Sulu kalis seem to exhibit a topographic etch though; given the vagaries of traveling blades and subsequent restorations, I don't think we can place much weight on this kind of evidence. Regards, Kai |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Greenville, NC
Posts: 1,854
|
![]()
The care and precision of chiseling are especially impressive on this blade.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 | |
Member
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 1,273
|
![]() Quote:
I don't completely understand your point in sentence about topographic etch if it relates to my previous post - maybe my English was wrong or wasn't clear enough. Surely blades travel and are subsequently differently treated - but the absence of topographical etch on an archaic blade makes it "more archaic" in my eyes - I don't think topographical etch was en vogue before the second half of 18th cent. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|