![]() |
|
|
|
|
#1 |
|
(deceased)
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Portugal
Posts: 9,694
|
Jim, just an intermediate note to say that, it was already established that, the 220 pounds gunpowder load is definitely unreal data, in the best, a miswriting flaw from the article author or of the article text itself.
More to come .
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2 | |
|
Arms Historian
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Route 66
Posts: 10,733
|
Quote:
Thanks Fernando, it seems there have been a lot of those in these many entries I have come across...kinda like the 25 mile range. 220 pounds.....yikes, wouldn't want to be within blocks let alone next to it...not even in a water tank! |
|
|
|
|
![]() |
|
|