![]() |
|
![]() |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
|
![]() |
#1 |
Member
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 6,990
|
![]()
Are fangs visible?
Even very small rudimentary ones would do, but unless we have those we cannot begin to think "raksasa". |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Vikingsword Staff
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 6,336
|
![]()
It would be nice to see this object photographed perhaps in open shade sunlight and a bit sharper, perhaps a view from the back also.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 | |
Member
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 1,740
|
![]() Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Member
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 6,990
|
![]()
Maybe there are fangs there Jean, I just cannot see the detail of this hilt well enough on my screen to know with certainty.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
Member
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 3,255
|
![]()
Tim asked me to extend thanks to all who responded!
He seems to have problems with logging in and I hope he'll be back soon. I'm adding a few more pics he send me for posting; Tim will try to take some more. Regards, Kai |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
Vikingsword Staff
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 6,336
|
![]()
I'm getting the impression from the images that Kai has posted that there is a Tumpal Throne involved here.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
Member
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 3,255
|
![]()
Yes, Rick, some of the tumpal motifs have been preserved in this design.
There also seems to be a garuda mungkur at the back of the head. I'm fairly sure there are fangs - we need sharper pics for verification though. There seem to be 2 elephants depicted at the front. The hilt sure does seem to have some age despite metal castings being notoriously difficult to appraise. However, I don't see any of the common motifs/details of very early carved hilts and suspect this piece is later work. Tim, any resin (or wood) inside the hilt? Regards, Kai |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 | |
Member
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Italy
Posts: 928
|
![]() Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|