![]() |
|
![]() |
#1 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Europe
Posts: 2,718
|
![]()
Here is a picture of the Danish one from 1849.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 | |
Member
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Room 101, Glos. UK
Posts: 4,224
|
![]() Quote:
![]() Does look like the One I posted earlier that appeared to be a phoney Danish one, but with a better guard the only noticeable difference. Maybe it was really a rare prototype? ![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Member
Join Date: Sep 2021
Location: Leiden, NL
Posts: 565
|
![]()
I received this Swedish naval NCO's sword today (pictured next to the M1851 cutlass I already had). I'm seeing some confusion about what to call this pattern. As far as I can tell it is identical to the infantry M1842, except for the anchor on the hilt, but during a search I've found various sources of information that call it M1842, M1843, and M1851, and the person selling it even named it M1820! So how do I index this? Does anyone have more reliable information about this specific model?
On a side note, having handled the M1893 cavalry sword and the M1851, I thought this one would be another beastly Swedish sword, but it is surprisingly light in the hand in comparison to the M1851 cutlass! |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|