![]() |
|
![]() |
#1 | |
Member
Join Date: Mar 2015
Posts: 33
|
![]() Quote:
Shazam, nothing about the blade screams Visayan other than the scrabard and handle that they slapped on their, which is something they usually do with a lot of the better weapons they can get their hands but obviously can't make themselves. Even the moros were not capable of making swords on par with that of europe and its western colonies. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 | |
Member
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 478
|
![]() Quote:
Last edited by mross; 18th April 2019 at 02:42 PM. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 | |
Member
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Germany, Dortmund
Posts: 9,164
|
![]() Quote:
Have a look here: http://www.vikingsword.com/vb/showth...t=visayan+daga Also not Visayan? ![]() ![]() Regards, Detlef |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Member
Join Date: Nov 2017
Posts: 23
|
![]()
What makes the blade obviously Visayan and original, in my opinion, is that the Kris Blade is straightly erected and aligned to the handle, as opposed to the Moro Kris. Kris's like this is something we see among Visayan and Luzon works but never beyond that.
Nobody on other regions of Asia makes a blade like that, not even Moros, let alone for some reason make one specifically for a few Visayans for no logical logistical reason behind it. Nor does it make sense for Moros to make blades for people we know they regularly raid. So unfortunately for Maharlika, his narrative that "literally all blades in the Visayas is imported" is not true. Last edited by ashkenaz; 14th May 2019 at 07:20 AM. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|