![]() |
![]() |
#26 | |
Arms Historian
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Route 66
Posts: 10,284
|
![]() Quote:
Near the end of the 18th c. the cross bar off the knuckleguard was added for additional 'protection' ..added bars became the three bar style cavalry hilts. This is basically what drove the development of complex guard systems such as the rapier from simple cross guards. As these guards, including knuckle guards, are not in contact with the hand, but in effect closed 'over' it, I cannot see how they would be intended to add to ones grip on the sword. With the intended purpose of hand protection, I cannot see either, how a simple, flimsy chain would effect any use for hand protection or even 'securing' ones hand on a hilt. The sword I have has the chain guard, which has broken loose several times just in storing and moving it......let alone any sort of combat use. Aside from my 'battle' with a ceiling fan with a tulwar in an unfortunate moment, I am usually pretty careful with my swords....so the damage to the chain guard on my sa'if was surprising. As always though, your approach to seeking answers on all accounts is great in analysis. With regard to items as 'vestigial' as these chain 'guards' , also curious are the shoulder chains often worn by British military officers during the Raj, recalling the wearing of mail to protect from sword cuts. These would hardly have served their ostensible purpose, but colorfully added to the character of the uniform. The use of the curious crescent shaped 'gorget' recalling armor plate also worn in this manner hardly served a real purpose otherwise, and were symbols of merit or rank. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
|
|