![]() |
|
![]() |
#1 |
Member
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 407
|
![]()
More pics.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Member
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 478
|
![]()
From what I am seeing in the pics, I wouldn't lose any sleep over it.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Member
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 407
|
![]()
So you think it is a bad Chinese copy of a Japanese blade? It is certainly not the best workmanship I have ever seen. If it were better, I would have bid higher.
An argument against it being Korean is that they almost never have a fuller. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 | |
Member
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 478
|
![]() Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
Member
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: Austria
Posts: 1,906
|
![]()
Purely decorative/tourist sword-like object with absolutely no ethnographic or historical value whether Chinese or Korean...
My two cents. ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Ann Arbor, MI
Posts: 5,503
|
![]()
Josh,
IMHO, you are lucky that some schmuck put a higher bid. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 | |
Member
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 422
|
![]() Quote:
http://www.arscives.com/historysteel...ction_main.htm |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 |
Member
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 407
|
![]()
Yes, I agonized over this. As a Chinese sword it is not very exciting, but as a Korean sword it is quite interesting. In terms of design characteristics it fits everything for a Korean sword, but not a Chinese or Japanese sword.
It is missing a habaki/tonku, but this also seems to be a somewhat variable trait. The primary argument against this sword is its overall "showiness" combined with a mediocre blade. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#9 |
Member
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 422
|
![]()
IMO, the blade looks very modern. As in late 20th or even 21st century, the kind of thing common on modern Chinese-made fake katana/tachi/gunto.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|