![]() |
|
![]() |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
|
![]() |
#1 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Ann Arbor, MI
Posts: 5,503
|
![]()
Agree. Architecture is a dead end in the search for the origin of beading: no connection to jewelry in all its applications.
We are left with two possibilities: 1. Beading was just a " prettyfying" design, devoid of any deep significance. 2. Beading has deep sacral meaning. Proponents of this theory should find primary sources supporting this hypothesis. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 | |
Member
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 478
|
![]() Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 | |
Member
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Moscow, Russia
Posts: 428
|
![]() Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Arms Historian
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Route 66
Posts: 10,597
|
![]()
Actually 'Occams Razor' typically does prevail in most investigative cases, but not all of course. It does remarkably depend on the character and values of the investigation, and in reality in these kinds of cases it is difficult to classify subjective meanings to a particular decoration or symbol.
It becomes very much a 'Rorschach' test in a sense as different ideas will be the perceptions of different people. I think here we are seeking any possible or likely value or tradition which might apply to beaded decoration in South India. I don't think that such views are in any way irreverent as expressed, and what is meant is that as often expressed, often decoration is applied aesthetically and perhaps may recall certain reverent or auspicious features. I think this is actually a respectful expression of a highly regarded element or form intended to enhance. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|