![]() |
|
![]() |
#1 | |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Singapore
Posts: 1,180
|
![]() Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 692
|
![]()
If we stick with the topic. It is a rehilted khyber. Thoose are not rare at all. In the anglo afgan war, brittains employed indian sepoys for fighting the afgans. Think about some looted tulwar, wich hilt was used for rehilting a khyber blade. I can immagine that this was done frequently during thoose years. Take a look at page 243 of Tirri's book.
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 | |
Member
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 123
|
![]() Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Ann Arbor, MI
Posts: 5,503
|
![]()
You want to tell us that there were different implements for each stage of execution? Why didn't they use the same Dha (Darb, Dahb
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
Member
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: 30 miles north of Bangkok, 20 miles south of Ayuthaya, Thailand
Posts: 224
|
![]()
Nah, not for cutting the rope. But for cleaving the feet.
![]() ![]() In some case, the criminal have to wear chain/ring (seems to be hammered in place, no lock, no key). And cutting the feet off seems to be easier than hammering it out. Dahb 's a weapon and it 's considered to be too high for such purpose. That 's why they use a meat cleaver. PS: My appologies for being off topic again ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|