![]() |
|
![]() |
#1 |
(deceased)
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Portugal
Posts: 9,694
|
![]()
Ruler Maharaja Kumar Isri Singh in a pool of water, bare-chested, and in hand-to-hand combat with a crocodile. He has just plunged his katar into the creature, which has evidently been caught by surprise while eating.
(The Met) . |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 | |
Member
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Russia
Posts: 1,042
|
![]() Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 | |||
Member
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Moscow, Russia
Posts: 428
|
![]() Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
But who are these people? Among them are travelers in India in the 16-18 centuries? P.S. How is nice when you can believe everything that is written in book or spoken on TV. But in the case of East it is.... the wrong way. ![]() Last edited by Mercenary; 23rd February 2019 at 12:13 PM. |
|||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Member
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Moscow, Russia
Posts: 428
|
![]()
All these images are a typical (standard) plot for illustrations of "Babur-name" in Akbar's time. Accordingly, warriors are armed in the same manner as the Mughals in the end of the 16th century.
On one of the images Babur fights with the Rajputs (description of the events of 1527). But we can see only Mughals weapons of the end of the 16th century. Can you indicate Rajputs there if not to take into account on what side the artillery is? In another image, Babur fights with Ahmad Tambal (description of the events of 1499). Before Babur's invasion of India! Again Mughals weapons of the end of the 16th century. Two images from one source, same time and even one workshop. Unlike images with scenes of hunting. I know how according to Turkic warrior tradition an enemy was pulled off a horse, thrown to the ground and he was beaten with a dagger into open places or his head was cut off. Someone may think that in the time of Akbar warriors were fighting on the horses with daggers? May be. They were trying to penetrate armour? May be. No problems. Dig it and I will happy to learn something new for all of us. But as long as it is not, I'd rather go watch National Geographic on TV. Last edited by Mercenary; 23rd February 2019 at 12:36 PM. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|