![]() |
|
![]() |
#1 | ||
Member
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 3,255
|
![]()
Hello Jose,
Quote:
Quote:
Regards, Kai |
||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 | |
EAAF Staff
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Louisville, KY
Posts: 7,272
|
![]() Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 | |
Member
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 3,255
|
![]()
Hello Jose,
Quote:
BTW, if you ever get access to this part again, I'd be interested in a thin sliver of the wood (preferably cut with a razor) for identification purposes. From the looks it seems that the wood surface exhibits some patina & wear: So, it wasn't freshly cut (nor a recent amputation of an older hilt). I reckon the current surface was never meant to be visible; otherwise, the hilt shape is pretty typical for the variant type (except for the scalloped pommel/top as you already mentioned; not all examples exhibit this feature though). My best bet would be that this hilt was fully covered with silver of which the top got lost sometime during use. Regards, Kai |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Member
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Germany, Dortmund
Posts: 9,164
|
![]()
Hello Jose, I agree with the most what Kai has written already and don't think that the handle was such a hulu jongo like you have given it now. All the lopah petawaran I've seen until now with a blade without decorated bolster has had a rather simple handle so I think that the top was covered with a silver capping instead of an elongation.
If the handle was upside down I am usure about but it is good possible. But a good restore job without doubt, congrats! ![]() Regards, Detlef |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|