![]() |
|
![]() |
#1 |
Member
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Russia
Posts: 1,042
|
![]()
Many thanks to Ariel for the fact that he once again repeated everything that had already been said before. Always need someone who will sum up.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Ann Arbor, MI
Posts: 5,503
|
![]()
Glad to be of service and help you to comprehend the topic.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Member
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Russia
Posts: 1,042
|
![]()
Thanks again! To be frank, I understood the topic a little earlier. This can be seen from the third message in this thread. But I hope helped you to learn new things.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Ann Arbor, MI
Posts: 5,503
|
![]()
I think you missed the point in that message : preponderance of evidence is in favor of South Indian origin, but not ,- as you suggested,- Afghani and most certainly not Sindhi. Moser's example #491 is from Sindh although he called it Afghani.
Where Corrado's gun " could have been used" is irrelevant: our family drives Toyotas, and Suzuki. All were bought in the US, but they are not American cars: they are Japanese. Elephant in a Moscow Zoo is still Indian. Weapons traveled along and across the entire Indian subcontinent without hindrance. Hope it makes the point clear, does it? Last edited by ariel; 29th August 2018 at 04:56 AM. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|