![]() |
|
![]() |
#1 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Europe
Posts: 2,718
|
![]()
Ariel,
I dont remember which picture I sent you, but here are a few from Hamza. It seems as if only two hilt forms were used, and notice in the picture showing many weapons, in the top left corner two of the swords have a hand guard. I dont remember tto have seen other swords with a hand guard in Hamza. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Ann Arbor, MI
Posts: 5,503
|
![]()
Great!!!
Many thanks! This is a wonderful reference for this and future discussions. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Europe
Posts: 2,718
|
![]()
Yes, the Hamza is very important if you want to study Indian weapons, beiing from the 16th century, and it shows a lot of different wepons, besides from telling a very special story.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2014
Posts: 143
|
![]()
I know this is an old thread , and ive kept this sword for some time, recently i have been informed by a few sword collectors that the sword in a piso pondang , sumatra and not indian !
whats your thoughts, is this right and how can we tell ? |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
Member
Join Date: Sep 2019
Location: France
Posts: 209
|
![]()
I think you right with the piso podang assumption !
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
Member
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 1,280
|
![]()
If I may suggest, just search for "chenangkas" and go to the thread "Piso Podang Batak or Borneo?" from 2011 please.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 | |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Ann Arbor, MI
Posts: 5,503
|
![]() Quote:
We seem to have a difference of opinions: nothing unusual in this field. I rely in Hamza Nama, Elgood, Brian Isaak and Jens. Personally, I could not think of better sources of info. But yours might be correct, too. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 |
Member
Join Date: Sep 2019
Location: France
Posts: 209
|
![]()
Gustav is maybe right too !
Hard choice ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|