![]() |
|
![]() |
#1 | |
Keris forum moderator
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Nova Scotia
Posts: 7,211
|
![]() Quote:
It was when colonial American powers placed a ban on swords, i believe, that we saw the gunong lengthen to compensate. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
EAAF Staff
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Louisville, KY
Posts: 7,272
|
![]()
Detlef is correct. In the late 1800s the gunong was small and not well ornamented. By the 1930s they were up to twice the size and often greatly ornamented.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Member
Join Date: Mar 2017
Posts: 445
|
![]()
So...if the smaller ones can be either earlier functional examples OR later tourist versions...how does one tell the difference?
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 | |
Vikingsword Staff
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: The Aussie Bush
Posts: 4,361
|
![]() Quote:
That's where a lot of reading and asking questions helps. There are general signs of wear and age that help, but seeking out high quality pieces (good workmanship and materials) is always worthwhile regardless of age. Many modern pieces are still functional. Some recently made gunong are definitely collectible and retain their value. Ian. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
EAAF Staff
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Louisville, KY
Posts: 7,272
|
![]()
I wish Federico Malibago still had his site up. It had the most information on gunongs I had ever seen, and we have used this info on this forum.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|