![]() |
|
![]() |
#1 | |
Arms Historian
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Route 66
Posts: 10,281
|
![]() Quote:
Beautifully done Cap'n Mark!!! I always greatly appreciate the way you bring in salient historical points beyond simple classification or typology. It adds so much dimension to our understanding of the weapon being examined. Thank you! Jim |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: NC, U.S.A.
Posts: 2,158
|
![]()
Thank you, Jim! Don't say that too often or I'll get a big head!
![]() ![]() But before I accept my award, I want to make sure that this isn't just another type of Dutch model before I go guessing that it is a prototype or private purchase assemblage. I know of of least two Dutch patterns that have this type hilt. Before the m1790, there was a very similar model pictured in Neumann, #48S, however, it also has the traditional curved blade. The point being, perhaps there IS a straight bladed pattern I'm unfamiliar with? Infantry favored straight bladed hangers of this type, as did naval. So, if it can't be pinned down as that, I would stick to 'private purchase naval', possibly one of a small batch and rather uncommon. A great piece, either way... Dutch sword experts, any thoughts??? |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: NC, U.S.A.
Posts: 2,158
|
![]()
So far, can't find a straight bladed Dutch saber or hanger of this type with the pattern 1780-90 hilt. Evidence seems to point to my original thought.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Member
Join Date: Mar 2017
Posts: 143
|
![]()
Dear Mark, thank you very much for the research effort.
I had an inkling it might be Dutch. I now hesitate to make suggestions as to identification, as every thing I have posted here has turned out to be something different from what I thought. I once had a Dutch sabre with a similar brass hilt and projection in the pommel cap, bought in Switzerland, with running-wolf blade snapped in the middle, with a vellum tag attached inscribed, 'Villmergen 1720', or something similar. ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
Member
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 607
|
![]()
Why would it be naval?! Because you want it to be?
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
Member
Join Date: Mar 2017
Posts: 143
|
![]()
Could be...and I saw something vaguely similar, described as French Naval. I'll re-check.
You spotted 'Dutch' first, many thanks. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: NC, U.S.A.
Posts: 2,158
|
![]()
Why would it be naval?! Because you want it to be? -Dmitry
But of course, my friend, of course! ![]() Still could be infantry. I was guessing naval because hilt is a known marine pattern and straight blades were popular with naval and finally because it appears to be a 'one off', something you wouldn't see in any other service at that time (army, artillery, infantry had their specific models/patterns) except private purchase. Boarders Away addressed these types and had some great ones illustrated... |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|