![]() |
|
![]() |
#1 | |
Member
Join Date: Apr 2017
Location: Sweden
Posts: 755
|
![]() Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 | |
Member
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: FRANCE
Posts: 1,065
|
![]() Quote:
Thank you very much for the books reference. Best CERJAK |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 | |
Member
Join Date: Apr 2017
Location: Sweden
Posts: 755
|
![]() Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Member
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 1,060
|
![]()
it can be a Dutch sword as well, the end of the knuckle guard has the same shape of an animal head as seen on matchlock muskets (fuse holder) from around the first half of the 17th century.
fe see http://www.vikingsword.com/vb/showthread.php?t=18207 best, Jasper Last edited by cornelistromp; 11th May 2017 at 03:45 PM. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
Member
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 263
|
![]()
Hi,
in 2005 I bought this sword and since then I have not seen anything like it. Maybe it is a Victorian mongrel. If I remove the branched guard and the ricasso perforated plates, I can imagine I will finish with something similar to the Dutch-Swedish felddegen... but still the pommel will be atypical. What do you make out of it? Measurements are something like 117cm total length, 93cm blade and 1495gr total weight. There is a thumb ring. The handle shows wire marks. The front edge seems to have been sharpened more often than the back. As you can see from the pictures, the hilt is huge and the thing seems to have been constructed to be used with gauntles. It handles nicely with them on. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|