![]() |
|
![]() |
#1 |
Vikingsword Staff
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: The Aussie Bush
Posts: 4,361
|
![]()
Hi Jose:
Only way to know for sure is to take the hilt off and see if the gangya is separate. Right now I don't see any clear evidence of separation--the visible line is very straight and shows no edge corrosion or oxidation to suggest a point of separation that has been present for a hundred years or so. I've tried to take similar looking ones apart before, only to discover the gangya was not separate. If this is a hundred year old sword, it is in a remarkable state of preservation. Ian. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Witness Protection Program
Posts: 1,730
|
![]()
... another way to find out if the gangya is separated is to see if the encircled part of the kris provided are attached or not
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Member
Join Date: Jun 2013
Posts: 1,255
|
![]()
Maybe these additional pictures will help to determine if the gangya is separate.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
EAAF Staff
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Louisville, KY
Posts: 7,272
|
![]()
I have had 3 similar Maguindanao kris (one stolen, one sold off) and the construction was nearly identical, and all 3 had separate gangas. I think this one is also.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
Keris forum moderator
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Nova Scotia
Posts: 7,211
|
![]()
Looks separate to me, just in case anyone is in the market for 2 cents.
![]() ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2016
Posts: 184
|
![]()
Nice! Congratulations!
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
Member
Join Date: Jun 2013
Posts: 1,255
|
![]()
Thanks; all opinions are appreciated !
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|