![]() |
|
![]() |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
|
![]() |
#1 | |||
Member
Join Date: Mar 2016
Location: Germany
Posts: 95
|
![]() Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Also browsing through the catalogue there were many shamshir handles on which the pommel caps didn't cover the handle scales, but there is a noticeable gap filled up with adhesive. So this could be the original hilt assembly after all. This begs the question of why is there no trace of adhesive above the guard? |
|||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Arms Historian
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Route 66
Posts: 10,281
|
![]()
While this may indeed be a 'basket case', as more historian than 'collector' or connoisseur, I always admire these battered old cases as old warriors who are in my opinion well worthy of restorative attention .
In my view, items should be 'stabilized' with as much use or repair of existing components as feasible. The damage and age found in these kinds of weapons to me stand as 'history' and literally untouched much in the sense of archaeologic discoveries. Perhaps a 'romantic' view admittedly, but I think profoundly valid. This appears to me to potentially a Persian shamshir which found use in the volatile frontiers of Afghanistan and India's northwest frontiers in the latter 19th century. The unusual lanyard ring on the pommel as well as the four dot devices emplaced in the blade are what suggests this to me. Not only worthy of necessary restoration, but continued research, as well exemplified by one of our long esteemed members who made a long running thread very much a group effort as he restored a 'basket case tulwar' from these regions. I always think of Philip Tom for the restoration and authentic stabilization of these kinds of weapons. There is history here, and that is not measured monetarily. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 | |
Member
Join Date: Jun 2015
Posts: 584
|
![]() Quote:
Regards Miguel |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Member
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: Austria
Posts: 1,911
|
![]()
After seeing the last photos, I am more convinced it is pattern welded, but very fine structure, somehow similar to the Hada on Japanese swords.
A very good blade! Last edited by mariusgmioc; 19th July 2016 at 09:51 PM. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 | |
Arms Historian
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Route 66
Posts: 10,281
|
![]() Quote:
Mariusgmioc, it is a very good blade, which is why I suggested Philip, who is a master with these kinds of blades and refinishing, and well known in our community. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 | |
Member
Join Date: Mar 2016
Location: Germany
Posts: 95
|
![]() Quote:
Thanks for you comment Jim, you captured my feelings on this issue really well. This sword somehow really speaks to me, and though I wouldn't say cost is no issue at all, I do not see this as a financial investment. I'd love to ask peter, since I've seen some examples of of his work. But this issue http://www.vikingsword.com/vb/showthread.php?t=21422 makes me a little hesitant to ship to the US. I've received some other suggestions per private message, which I think I will try first. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 | |
Member
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: Germany
Posts: 525
|
![]() Quote:
I have made very well experiences with a professional restorer in Olbernhau (not me!). He restored my Yatagan perfectly. Roland |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 |
Member
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 411
|
![]()
Just a suggestion, but could it be a blade from a tulwar modified with a shamshir style hilt to make it saleable in the Arab market?
Regards Richard |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#9 | |
Member
Join Date: Mar 2016
Location: Germany
Posts: 95
|
![]() Quote:
As for the tulwar vs. shamshir debate, that may well be, I've seen lots of shamshir blades mounted on tulwar hilts, but the tang on this sword is actually still pretty long, the exposed part is already close to 8 cm, and the tangs of tulwar blades I have seen so far have been a lot shorter. Intestingly the sword feels quite hefty in the hand. The balance point is down about a third of the length of the blade and the spine is quite thick with about 6 mm until very close to the tip. So I was quite suprised when it weighed in at only 750 grams. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#10 | |
Member
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Germany, Dortmund
Posts: 9,207
|
![]() Quote:
the upper scales are for sure walrus ivory, what are used by the lower parts I can't say from your pictures. The restoration will be a challenge but is possible and IMHO worth the effort. Maybe contact Roland, I've seen the yat restoration, very good. An other option will be a restorer you can find here: http://www.bfn.de/0305_sachverstaend...ller%5D=Expert Best regards, Detlef |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|