Ethnographic Arms & Armour
 

Go Back   Ethnographic Arms & Armour > Discussion Forums > Ethnographic Weapons
FAQ Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old 21st June 2016, 09:55 PM   #1
ariel
Member
 
ariel's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Ann Arbor, MI
Posts: 5,503
Default

AFAIK, just to decrease the weight without compromising stiffness.

I have heard opinions that they actually increased blade stiffness by approximating profile of the blade to the I-type configuration, but several engineering souls said that it was nonsense, and that stiffness actually decreases but not by much.

Beyond that I am totally ignorant: math was never my strong suit:-)
ariel is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21st June 2016, 09:58 PM   #2
ariel
Member
 
ariel's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Ann Arbor, MI
Posts: 5,503
Default

Ooops....
You were too fast , or I was too slow:-)

But I am glad I was able to transmit the wisdom of the professionals without major errors:-)
ariel is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21st June 2016, 10:10 PM   #3
Oliver Pinchot
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Posts: 468
Default

Strictly speaking, a fuller is a depression which is forged into the blade with a fullering tool. Anything cut or ground into the blade following rough forging by mechanical means is called a groove.
Oliver Pinchot is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22nd June 2016, 03:12 AM   #4
ariel
Member
 
ariel's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Ann Arbor, MI
Posts: 5,503
Default

That's new to me!
So fullers are in fact better than grooves?
Thanks Oliver!
ariel is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22nd June 2016, 05:27 AM   #5
kahnjar1
Member
 
kahnjar1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: CHRISTCHURCH NEW ZEALAND
Posts: 2,809
Default

Thanks for info so far, but I am still not sure WHY they are there. Most European (military) swords do not have them and do not seem to suffer from either weakness of heaviness. So the question really remains as to what purpose they serve.
Stu
kahnjar1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22nd June 2016, 06:15 AM   #6
Oliver Pinchot
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Posts: 468
Default

I think Timo answered the question quite concisely above.
Oliver Pinchot is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22nd June 2016, 07:39 AM   #7
kahnjar1
Member
 
kahnjar1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: CHRISTCHURCH NEW ZEALAND
Posts: 2,809
Default

Thanks Oliver. Yes I see and understand the reasoning outlined by Timo.
kahnjar1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22nd June 2016, 07:53 AM   #8
RobertGuy
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2015
Posts: 135
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by kahnjar1
Thanks for info so far, but I am still not sure WHY they are there. Most European (military) swords do not have them and do not seem to suffer from either weakness of heaviness. So the question really remains as to what purpose they serve.
Stu
Not sure what time period you are referring to but most of my European military swords have fullers. All of my 18th and 19th century cavalry swords do as do most of the infantry ones. There are a few exceptions; British 1833 General Officers sword, Drummers swords, some hangers and cutlasses. Pipe backed blades were a slightly different attempt to add stiffness without compromising weight too much but were not used for long.
RobertGuy is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 05:22 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Posts are regarded as being copyrighted by their authors and the act of posting material is deemed to be a granting of an irrevocable nonexclusive license for display here.