![]() |
|
![]() |
#1 | |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2014
Location: Black Forest, Germany
Posts: 1,231
|
![]() Quote:
regards corrado26 |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Member
Join Date: Apr 2010
Posts: 671
|
![]()
Fernando K
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2014
Location: Black Forest, Germany
Posts: 1,231
|
![]()
Ok, thank you, I forgot the Spanish flintlocks, but the lock of the pistol is certainly not a Spanish one
Regards corrado26 |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Member
Join Date: Apr 2010
Posts: 671
|
![]()
Hello
If, of course, the lock is not Spanish. Only me just say that the flat shape of the plate, the hammer-shaped gooseneck, the bowl round. the auction of frizzen, and the front screw lock are numerous and do not serve to ensure the origin. Subi image of Spanish solamentre lock as an example Affectionately. Fernando K |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
Member
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: Michigan, U.S.A.
Posts: 108
|
![]()
OK, to clarify. It is the outside dimensions of the BARREL that are about the same as my light dragoon pistol. Not the stock, not the hardware.
I noted this to confirm that, whatever is this pistol, it is NOT a cut down musket or carbine. At least, when I hold it in front of a Long Land and an India pattern Brown Bess it is clear that this pistol could not come out of that pattern wood, likewise the breech diameter of the musket is quite a bit larger.. The sideplate of the pistol in service is stamped 94, which corresponds to the 94 (not shown) stamped deeply into the wood, right side of grip. I might guess that this stood for 1794, much as 08 on a long dragoon pistol meant, I dare say, 1808. With quite a bit of imagination one might discern English proof marks near the breech. It was a kindness of someone to paint it black, as corrosion has taken its toll. I have had the impression that the British used simpler, or older, patterns for the Sea Service. I suppose I got this from Battle Weapons of the American Revolution, George C. Neumann, ©1998. Specific examples that have features somewhat like my pistol are: page 34 (5) Circa 1750-1780, flat sea service lock . . . frizzen often squared; page 77 27.MM English Sea Service , . . the lock and furniture continued to follow early Queen Anne period styling . . . a rounded trigger guard front terminal. . . You gentlemen have inspired me to do the homework I should have earlier. I really don't know much about English Sea Service firearms. I would be thankful if someone would point me to an appropriate reference book other than Neumann. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2014
Location: Scotland
Posts: 126
|
![]()
Hi James,
If you can find it you could try: R.Brooker, British Military Pistols 1603-1888, pub.1978 by American Soc. of Arms Collectors; or D.W.Bailey, Small Arms of the British Forces in America 1664-1815, pub. 2009 by Mowbray (in USA) Both of these have info on the pistols you want, incl. Sea Service. Hope this helps, Neil |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
Member
Join Date: Oct 2012
Posts: 26
|
![]()
It would be interesting to see the inside of the lock. From the pictures the trigger screw can be seen but not any sign of a sear spring screw. Not an English lock type i have ever seen. Can you also show what you think might be some proof marks ?
You said it could not be a cut down because the barrel of the Brown Bess was larger. That's assuming it was a military cut down but sporting rifle were changed at times. I had in the past a cut down rifle that was made into a pistol of a similar shape that had been used in the British penal system. In the early 18 hundreds the prisons were busy and not well funded so any weapon was made use of. Anyway, Its old ,it's yours and a bit of interesting history. Have Fun |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|