![]() |
|
![]() |
#1 |
Member
Join Date: Apr 2010
Posts: 671
|
![]()
Hello
Of course, it is not a service weapon, by a absence of proof punches and other inscriptions. In addition, the auction of lated. The hammer, although legitimate, does not correspond to the time the rest of the lock Fernando K |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Member
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 803
|
![]()
It does appear old, but as already noted not Sea Service.
The lock with the faceted pan looks rather Germanic to me. Best. R. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2014
Location: Black Forest, Germany
Posts: 1,231
|
![]()
This lock with its battery spring ending left of the screw that fixes the lock to the butt is typical Austrian: It is the lock of the ordnance pistol M 1770. But the triggerguard and sideplate are of an other unknown but certainly European origin.
corrado26 |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Member
Join Date: Apr 2014
Location: Louisiana
Posts: 363
|
![]()
It looks old, except for the ramrod.
However the lock and trigger guard do not look like British issue. It appears to me to have been assembled from various parts a long time ago. The stock looks like a cut down carbine or musket stock due to the profile. The lack of a buttcap also gives me pause. It has a great patina and appears to have been legitimately used a long time ago, but any further attribution at this point (in my opinion), is strictly conjecture. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
Member
Join Date: Apr 2010
Posts: 671
|
![]()
Hello
Numerous lock have the screw securing the lock to the stock right spring frizzen, so that is not a feature to define the origin of the lock, also other differences with the lock rise by corrado, as the auction of noticeable frizzen, a difference in the conformation of the gooseneck and the shape of "banana shape" of the plate of the lock and the pan is rounded and not facetted and depressed area at the end of the plate. Affectionately. Fernando K Sorry for the translator |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
Member
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: Michigan, U.S.A.
Posts: 108
|
![]()
For what it's worth, the "390" is some manner of museum mark, not original to the pistol.
The pan is faceted, not round Barrel measurements show that it is not a cut down musket. The profile is identical to a light dragoon pistol, not to a Brown Bess. Otherwise, thank you, Gentlemen, for looking it over. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
Member
Join Date: Apr 2014
Location: Louisiana
Posts: 363
|
![]()
Sometime Irish registry marks are stamped similar to this. Seeing how guns were so highly restricted there going way back, it wouldn't surprise me that it could have been put together there.
I don't think the shape of the pommel, length of the grip and lack of a buttcap make this a candidate to be a light Dragoon pistol! |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 | |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2014
Location: Black Forest, Germany
Posts: 1,231
|
![]() Quote:
regards corrado26 |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#9 |
Member
Join Date: Apr 2010
Posts: 671
|
![]()
Fernando K
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#10 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2014
Location: Black Forest, Germany
Posts: 1,231
|
![]()
Ok, thank you, I forgot the Spanish flintlocks, but the lock of the pistol is certainly not a Spanish one
Regards corrado26 |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|