![]() |
|
![]() |
#1 | |
Member
Join Date: Jun 2015
Posts: 584
|
![]() Quote:
Hi Arsendade. Thank you so much for taking the time out to respond to my post it is much appreciated. Your comments and observations are most informative and valuable to me as I have little knowledge of these weapons or the Caucasus. I had been carrying out some research but seemed to be going round in circles as I found the information I gleaned from the many and various sites that I visited to be very conflicting so your comments were most refreshing. I do not know how the photos became out of sequence with my comments but Kindjal No 4 is shown before No 3 And two of No 6 are shown out of sequence also. I had made some guesses my self but without your obvious knowledge and am quite pleased that some of my guesses agree with some of yours, I guessed the following:- No 1:- Fake or Tourist piece, No 2:- Chechen due to its long armour piercing point ? No 3:- Didn't know, No 4 :- I thought maybe Dagestan due to its having a similar style blade stamp to No 7 which I also thought may be Dagestan , No 5 :- I thought that this may be Persian or Kazakstan and No 6 :- I was not sure whether it was Georgian or Russian as it has the Don assay stamp. It would be very nice now if someone in the Forum could translate the script on the blade and scabbard and if someone could shed any light on the blade stamps as I have spent a lot of time trying to find out without success. Thank you again for your reply. Kind regards Miguel |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Member
Join Date: Jun 2015
Posts: 584
|
![]()
I have found out more about Kindjals in these latest replies than I have done in all the time I have spent giving myself a headache on the web.
I particularly wish to thank Arsendaday for your most informative replies and for sharing the photo of the Kindjal with the superb blade and your Quaddara post showing your Quaddara which looks to be better quality than mine. I also wish to apologise to you for miss-spelling your name in my first reply to you. Finally with regard to the collecting disease I am afraid there is no cure. I would also like to thank Mariusgmioc for his comments which cut through all the confusion of names. Thank you. Miguel |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 | |
Member
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: Austria
Posts: 1,906
|
![]() Quote:
![]() PS: Try getting "Arms and Armor of Caucasus," by Kirill A Rivkin. It's the best reference on this topic... and beautifully illustrated as well... while still available! |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 | |
Member
Join Date: Jun 2015
Posts: 584
|
![]() Quote:
![]() Miguel |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 | |
Member
Join Date: Sep 2015
Posts: 44
|
![]() Quote:
![]() The only other daggers fullered this way and of this size are Surmene Daggers, but they have very distinctive handles and blades (last photo and also check this link: http://www.vikingsword.com/vb/showthread.php?t=933) So I consider this the Caucasian ancestor of Persian/Isfahan Qaddara. P.S. I welcome all feedback on this knife. ![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
Member
Join Date: Sep 2015
Posts: 44
|
![]()
Here are the photos.
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
Member
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Toronto, Canada
Posts: 1,242
|
![]()
Hi Arsen,
The last knife you posted is a Surmene knife from Trabzon. Probably they all have similar ancestry as Qaddara, a single edged Qama of some kind. My understanding has always been that kindjal are double-edged daggers and short-swords, Qaddara are single edged Persian sword versions of the kindjal, and qama may be single or double-edged variations of the kindjal. Emanuel |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 | |
Member
Join Date: Jun 2015
Posts: 584
|
![]() Quote:
![]() Kind regards Miguel |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|