![]() |
|
![]() |
#1 | |
Member
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Kansas City, MO USA
Posts: 312
|
![]() Quote:
![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Member
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 123
|
![]()
Probably, Thai arts are influence by the Balinese, also. They were contact between cultures in Southeast Asia, exchanging ideas and goods back in the ancient time. And, also, Siam kingdom once ruled part of the Indonesian Island when it was expanding its influence.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Member
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Toronto, Canada
Posts: 1,242
|
![]()
Hello to all,
Looking at the beautiful hilts of the Sanduko swords, I can't help being reminded of the moro pira with their elongated hilts. Could the pira hilt -although functional in protecting the arm- be a stylized/simplified version of these Sanduko hilts and if so could they represent the same deity/dragon? The pictures below are both from Spunjer's old posts, I apologize for not asking permission first and I hope he won't mind. Regards, Manolo |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Member
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 123
|
![]()
I would imagine the one with the hilt made of wood would absorb the shock better on impact, and also cut down on the weight; thus, it makes it easier to use.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 | |
Member
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Kansas City, MO USA
Posts: 312
|
![]() Quote:
![]() I think being a pira may have to do more with the blade shape than just the hilt. With the design differences (and correct me if I am wrong) it would seem that the two sword blade and hilt shapes serve different purposes as weapons. Not all Bakunawas have a long nose (some are very short - see Spunjer's avatar). It would mean that the Sanduko would alone have been the influence for the pira (a bit of a hard sale).... The Sanduko "horn" really serves no protective purpose (it seems to easily break). Mine was broken; I doubt it happened in combat (more like in rough handling). It would be nice to know why the differences for the Bakunawas. ![]() Last edited by Rick; 24th January 2006 at 11:59 PM. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 | |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Witness Protection Program
Posts: 1,730
|
![]() Quote:
BSMStar, here's another tidbit: i had a custom binangon made the last time i was in P.I. for the handle design, i requested the knob style. panday's reaction was, "oh, the chicken gizzard!" i asked, well isn't that suppose to be a stylized 'naga' head? he laughed and told me, "son, where did you ever got that stupid idea from?" ![]() ![]() ![]() but then again, this is just one panday's opinion... |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
Member
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Kansas City, MO USA
Posts: 312
|
![]()
Well Spunjer, I guess one man's naga is another man's chicken gizzard.
![]() ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 |
Member
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Kansas City, MO USA
Posts: 312
|
![]()
Here is a link to some great sword pics that I have mentioned before, scroll down.... Love those dragons!!!
http://www.vikingsword.com/ubb/Forum.../001969-2.html |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#9 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: What is still UK
Posts: 5,854
|
![]()
This used to be in my paternal grandparents house. I always admired it as a little boy. It is really just an old tourist thing but quite striking.
![]() A South American Godzilla. This beats working. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#10 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 1,247
|
![]()
Hi BSMStar,
There are some studies out there about how fossils have been (allegedly) incorporated into ancient art, including some pictures on Greek vases, and legends of the bones of giants (Europe, N America, etc). That said....how old do you think some of these pots are? There have been pics of dinosaurs around for almost a century now, and I'd be amazed if some forgers....excuse me, indigenous potters working for the faux-archeology/tourist trade...haven't been incorporating some of the images (say, from Charles Knight, or even godzilla) into the "ancient" pots that they sell here and there. Without a good provenance, it's probably better to be skeptical. As for dragons being misidentified dinosaurs, I suspect they were, in some cases. Thing is, the term "dragon" encompasses a huge range of mythological critters that contain some sort of reptilian element. It can be informative to look at the real diversity in "dragons" especially in Medieval art. Aside from having a reptilian element, it's hard to say exactly what a dragon is: worm, snake, lizard, crocodile? Winged or wingless? Single or multiply-headed? Satan? a treasure guard? in the water, under the earth, flying, etc... you get the idea. It's more of a category than a species, I think. F |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|