![]() |
|
![]() |
#1 | |
Member
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: USA
Posts: 1,492
|
![]() Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Member
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: St. Louis, MO area.
Posts: 1,630
|
![]()
Gentlemen: Thank you all for your responses. Much appreciated.
Hi Kubur: Happy New Year to you also ! And to others here. Some interesting suggestions you offer here. Hmmm. The leather recoil pad would make sense. But I've never really seen one of these used on an Ottoman style gun, like you do on the Arab/Omani style guns. The wall/rampart idea is possible. But these are usually, as you mention, the very heavy barrel wall guns with the wide/thick stocks. Hi Grendolino: Yes, I know exactly what you are saying with the rear of the butt stocks often being made in sections, and decorated as you mentiond. But in this case (and others that I have handled and seen in reference material) has a butt plate nailed to the stock. And the patina of the brass matches the rest of the brass decoration exactly. So this short stock gun was made this way. Hi Estcrh: See pic below of the short stock gun with the brass butt plate. Also the butt of the first gun with the full length butt stock with no evidence there ever was a butt plate. Which would have possibly kept the crack in the stock from forming. Rick. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Member
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 803
|
![]()
Rick,
I am sure these were to be used as a cheek -stock. supported between the arms and not against the shoulder. Many Senegalese stocks, like the Japanese, are short as well. (Also the European arms many were copied from were also cheek -stocked) As some of these better decorated arms are likely for sporting purposes, I don't think the rampart idea fits particularly well, but I could be wrong. How does the piece in question align when held in this manner? (against cheek) Richard. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Member
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: St. Louis, MO area.
Posts: 1,630
|
![]()
Hi Richard.
Thanks for your response. I also thought about how some of the early European wheellock rifles, for sporting purposes, were also cheek-stocked. I too, at this point, am convinced that these short butt stocks on the Ottoman guns were designed to be shot from the cheek. It seems like the most logical conclusion. If you bring the short stock up to the cheek and aim the front and rear sights, it aligns perfectly. Since both of these guns are live shooters, I can attest that the cheek stock gun is actually a bit faster to aim and fire than the shoulder-stocked gun. So it may have been that it was a simple matter of shooter's preference in building the gun stocks. Rick. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
Member
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 803
|
![]()
Rick,
Thanks for the answer to how they align. Cheek -stocked target arms have been made since the matchlock, and in fact they Had to be fired in this manner to be eligible for certain matches. Was the original bore rifled? |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
Member
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: St. Louis, MO area.
Posts: 1,630
|
![]()
Hi Richard.
The cheek stock gun was originally a smooth bore, and now has a new smooth bore liner. The shoulder stock gun was originally rifled, and now has a new rifled liner. The cheek stock gun is a bit of an ugly duckling LOL It has a couple of period repairs from field use. Plus, while the barrel is an original, it was not original to this gun. The diameter is a bit large for the fore stock. That's why the barrel bands look a bit tall. The shoulder stock gun was originally made with a slightly larger lock, and changed to a bit smaller lock - back in the period. The evidence is there if you remove the lock and view the mortice. But it was done very professionally back in the day. So I thought these were good candadites to make into shooters. Thanks again for everyones input. Rick. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|