Ethnographic Arms & Armour
 

Go Back   Ethnographic Arms & Armour > Discussion Forums > Ethnographic Weapons
FAQ Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old 27th November 2015, 03:59 PM   #1
Tim Simmons
Member
 
Tim Simmons's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: What is still UK
Posts: 5,889
Default

End of.
Attached Images
 
Tim Simmons is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 8th January 2016, 02:06 PM   #2
Mercenary
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Moscow, Russia
Posts: 428
Default

I just wanted to post the image in the thread "Period Photos of People with Ethnographic Arms", but noticed that there are only photos. So I decided to put some more pictures and information.
From "Seventy two specimens of castes in India":
Attached Images
 
Mercenary is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 8th January 2016, 02:11 PM   #3
Mercenary
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Moscow, Russia
Posts: 428
Default

Some more images. And as I know in Italian journal in English will be published the articles of D.Miloserdov ("mahratt" on the forum) about the weapons from rostrum of sawfish in Indo-Persian region.
Attached Images
   
Mercenary is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 9th January 2016, 12:11 AM   #4
ariel
Member
 
ariel's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Ann Arbor, MI
Posts: 5,503
Default

I guess there are three distinct groups of such "swords":

1. Genuine native examples . Those need to be treated with respect: their owners were true warriors who used the only materials available to them with imagination and dignity.

2. Scrimshaw examples made often (if not mostly) by bored sailors or beachcombers to pass time or just to enjoy the ability to fashion something pretty. Those are good examples of folk arts and crafts, with no connection to any military purpose or tradition. In the same category as trench art.

3. Pretentious mixes of true military parts ( handles mostly) and plain sawfish rostra, despite easy availability of true fighting blades. Those I would view as shameless pretenders, exotics for its own sake and ,- most likely,- touristy items. They have neither fighting purpose, nor artistic flair. Discussing them seriously is akin to pondering upon military significance of General Tso's chicken.
ariel is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 9th January 2016, 10:02 AM   #5
Mercenary
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Moscow, Russia
Posts: 428
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ariel
I guess
Why guess? You have read the article in Russian. May I post your public review here? Your opinion will be very important for colleagues:
Quote:
Very good article: a detailed, sober and indisputable examples.
With respect.
Ariel

Last edited by Mercenary; 9th January 2016 at 10:55 AM.
Mercenary is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11th January 2016, 08:39 PM   #6
Mercenary
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Moscow, Russia
Posts: 428
Default

From Palace Museum of Forbidden City. Qing Dinasty:
Attached Images
   
Mercenary is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11th January 2016, 08:49 PM   #7
Tim Simmons
Member
 
Tim Simmons's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: What is still UK
Posts: 5,889
Default

Great contribution ! If you were to be slashed by a sawfish sword weapon you would be in a very poor state. I think it has been established that pre industrial communities used these natural resources as weapons. That is all I wanted to show in the beginning.
Tim Simmons is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 10:01 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Posts are regarded as being copyrighted by their authors and the act of posting material is deemed to be a granting of an irrevocable nonexclusive license for display here.