![]() |
|
![]() |
#1 |
Member
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 14
|
![]()
does this help?
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Member
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 14
|
![]()
Still struggling with resizing attachments.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Member
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 1,060
|
![]()
it seems a transition model around 1580, this type of blade was used on two hand swords between 1550 and 1575, the pommel and guard are of a later date 1580-1600.
the abrubtly stopping quillon finals are very unusual, you'd also expect (3 )curls here. maybe the guard is a bit altered and shortened in the 16thC. it's a beautiful unharmed original sword, congrats! best, |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Member
Join Date: Jul 2014
Posts: 412
|
![]()
I agree with Jasper,
The missing curls on the quillions is very unusual and this could indeed be a later transformation or even a variation on this type of guard. All the decoration on the quillions and pommel is in the traditional fashion and fits the time line of the sword. This sword has indeed all characteristics of an original late 16th great sword, and they are not deliberately enhanced to make it look that way ! The maker will for now remain unknown but congratulations with this original two handed sword ! Kind regards Ulfberth |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
Member
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 14
|
![]()
Thanks so much for your assistance... I also inherited a slightly damaged polearm that might be contemporary with the sword. Is there a different forum that enjoys looking at such a weapon or do you have interest in seeing it?
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 | |
Member
Join Date: Apr 2014
Posts: 233
|
![]() Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
Member
Join Date: Jul 2014
Posts: 412
|
![]()
Yes Dayton,
Please do post it here, this will be interesting and this could shed more light on the topic. kind regards Ulfberth |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|