![]() |
|
![]() |
#1 |
Vikingsword Staff
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 6,339
|
![]()
True about the furniture; but the wood is in such good condition also or appears to be .
Considering the climate where this gun lived and how quickly wood degrades there I'd guess it must have been re-stocked at some point . |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Member
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 385
|
![]()
I have some Japanese guns, with similar extremes in patina. Perhaps, as in Japan, guns in Malaya are very restricted. Maybe the barrels, and stocks/furniture are stored separately? Most of my Tanegashima, were bootlegged out of Japan, via Gunbroker. Here are some better photos of this gun.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 | |
Member
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: CHRISTCHURCH NEW ZEALAND
Posts: 2,789
|
![]() Quote:
Agreed, but if the wood is something like teak, then it is likely to stand up to the conditions. Trenchwarfare....do we know what the wood is please? Stu |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Member
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: AUCKLAND,NEW ZEALAND
Posts: 627
|
![]()
THE TANEGASHIMAS WERE MOSTLY MADE OF CHERRYWOOD,THE UNUSUAL SHAPE OF THE BUTT OF TRENCHWARFARES MATCHLOCK AND THE TANGASHIMAS IS THEY WERE CHEEK FIRED,CHEERS
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
Member
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 385
|
![]()
The stock does appear to be Teak. The stocks on all five of my Tanegashima, are Japanese Red Oak. Most made to look like Cherry. If you look closely, you can see the open Oak grain.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
Member
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 385
|
![]()
Does anyone have any idea, as to the age of this gun? I have searched the internet, and information is very sketchy. The only photographed examples I can find, are in some metropolitan museum, or in a Bonham's, or Christie's auction catalogue. Is it a wall gun, or was it fired from a rest? It's far too heavy for some 90 pound Malay guy to carry around.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 | |
Member
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: St. Louis, MO area.
Posts: 1,632
|
![]() Quote:
WOW!! What a beast!! At 18lbs. this definately puts it in the catagory of a wall gun. Especiaaly with a cheek mount. Or otherwise requiring some type of stand or rest. Maybe even resting on the shoulder of another warrior about mid way down the barrel while the other is aiming and firing? LOL. ![]() In any case, it's a very cool gun. It's really hard to date these guns. But with the full length, tapered octagon barrel, my best guess is somewhere in the 1870's or earlier 19th Century. Unlike the Japanese pieces, there's so little information about them. But the locks all look very similar. Rick. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 |
Member
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 385
|
![]()
I mis-guessed the weight of this gun. It's closer to 12 pounds. Still, quite a bit for a hand held weapon. Especially when you figure comparable guns from other regions weigh only around 6/8 pounds.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|