![]() |
|
![]() |
#1 |
Member
Join Date: Aug 2014
Posts: 15
|
![]()
The scabbard seems to be too fancy. It is not traditional Caucasian scabbard for sure. Probably the later replacement.
For the hilt - seems to be quite good for early XIX century kindjals. The blade is strange - for koftgari, shape etc. To my mind it could be (not for sure!) the Arabian imitation of Caucasian kindjal made after 1860th somewhere in Ottoman Empire in the best case. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Member
Join Date: Sep 2014
Posts: 905
|
![]()
Hello,
thank you both for your message and informations. Can't it be an ( copy of ?) ottoman court dagger, common in Turkey in 18th-19th century ? An idea about the price of such a model ? I paid it approximately 200 $ and wonder if it was a good, normal or bad business for me... Thank you Francesco |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Member
Join Date: Sep 2012
Posts: 465
|
![]()
This is Ottoman work from the Black Sea region and was called "kama" in Turkish, or simply, "hancer." It's not a superior example but very good and complete nonetheless. Dates 1800 c.e. - 1850 c.e. Note that the scabbard lacks anything more than a simple loop to secure it-- it was thrust into the silahluk along with pistols and accoutrements, beside or in place of, a yatagan.
Last edited by Oliver Pinchot; 12th September 2014 at 01:41 AM. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|