![]() |
|
![]() |
#1 |
Vikingsword Staff
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: The Aussie Bush
Posts: 4,396
|
![]()
Technically, this style of Naga sword has been called a sword-dao (see Rawson, The Indian Sword, and this link http://www.vikingsword.com/ethsword/nagadao/index.html).
For a more detailed explanation of nomenclature, see this online article: http://www.arscives.com/historysteel...ea.article.htm Ian. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Member
Join Date: Sep 2013
Posts: 79
|
![]()
I have a theory that this item in Topkapı Palace Museum Armory(which is identified as a executioner's sword for some reason) is actually a broken/short Naga sword that is fitted to a 19th-20th century(possibly european style) hilt and a scabbard.
![]() I'd like to remind you that there are many blades from the İndian subcontinent and Soth East Asia in Topkapı Armoury; many of them rehilted. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 | |
Member
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 2,818
|
![]() Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Member
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 88
|
![]()
The Jinghpaw (the main Kachin dialect) word for sword is nhtu. Dah is Myen-ga (Burmese language); Dao is Muwa-ga (Chinese). Hkahku (upriver) and Duleng are Jinghpaw sub-groups. Nung, or more properly Anung are a Rawang sub-group.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 | |
Member
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 2,818
|
![]() Quote:
So would it be fair to say this example is a Rawang nhtu?? Based on your linguistic lesson (Thank you), nhtu is correct terminology for this sword type, Dah secondary when considering Burmese borders that the Kachin people are within but where does Dao actually fit in? I see the Atsi and Lashi & Lisu mainly border China. Do these sub groups of Kachin people use any other name for swords other than nhtu? With thanks |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
Member
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 88
|
![]()
Basically, I know only a limited amount of Jinghpaw, and keep in mind that Jinghpaw has multiple dialects, so nhtu may not the only Jinghpaw word. The Rawangs likewise have multiple dialects ie Matwang, Anung, Lungmi, Tangsar etc, some of which are mutually unintelligible, so again there is a high possibility that there are multiple words. I'll have to ask my Rawang friends what word they use. I've also got a couple of Maru friends I can ask.
I can't think if any Atsi speakers that I know of around here (Oklahoma), but maybe there are some down in Dallas. Also, the Lisu are sometimes Kachins, sometimes not, and some Rawangs would also object to being classified as Kachins. Anyway, you can see why people would just call any sword from Burma a Dha rather than get bogged down in the ethnographic swamp that ethnic classification can entail. The current census classifications are a serious bone of contention in Burma even as speak. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 | |
Member
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Toronto, Canada
Posts: 1,242
|
![]()
Hello Sancar,
I think the piece you show is more likely part of a hunting trousse of European origin. These kits for preparing the animal carcass onsite often included large cleavers with weird blades (see attached example). As Gavin noted, the Naga dao in question has the edge on the straight side, with a concave spine. While there are Naga blades with concave edges they are quite different from the Topkapi piece. Emanuel Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 |
Member
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 420
|
![]()
I appreciate the information and links.
Marcus |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#9 |
Member
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 2,818
|
![]()
Ian, technically, what you are looking at is a Kachin Dah from the Kachin Tribes and regions.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kachin_State The sword type is from the Hkahku, Nung, Duleng, Jinghpaw and other Kachin tribes and is very well evidenced. There is a historical photo I know of showing a similar sword initially pictured here with a young Nung man, albeit the scabbard carries more yellow pigment. Rawson's reference, plate 37 in my edition, is noted as being from the Khamti Shan, a region that borders Kachin states. Beyond Kachin boundaries and border states such as the Khamti Shan that Rawson notes, these are very rarely seen and likely the result of raid rather than trade or manufacture. I do not recall the sword type pictured in Egerton. Stone, whilst good to refer to doesn't offer any support for what he based the description of figure 4 on but does note specifically the Naga dao sword types as "With no Distinct pommel" so I can see how he grouped the standard demure pommeled sword of his for his book. Being a traditional Kachin sword the correct term is Dah Last edited by SwordsAntiqueWeapons; 1st September 2014 at 03:37 PM. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|