![]() |
|
![]() |
#1 |
Member
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 293
|
![]()
Hi Bill,
Obviously, religion had much to do with the outcome. The Spaniards had a religion well suited for conquest, unlike that of those who were conquered. The religion of the natives controlled their way of thinking how they conducted wars - which often defied logic. While the natives waited for the right omen to launch an attack (for example, sound of a sacred bird), the Spaniards were already in an advanced stage of battle preparation. I too like Diamond's theories, but also think they are too simplistic. Nonoy |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Member
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 293
|
![]()
The role of the Spaniards in the conquest of the Inca, although crucial, was often over-rated. The majority of Inca casualties were likely caused not by the Spaniards but other Indian armies.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Wq_21QfGRpg This is the same experience found in the Philippines, for example, when Manila fell to the large Bisayan armies that accompanied the Spaniards in the 16th century. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|