![]() |
|
![]() |
#1 |
Member
Join Date: Nov 2013
Posts: 456
|
![]()
I cleaned up the newly exposed ricasso as best I could, but I don't see any markings. You'd think if it was a mid 19th century or newer blade it would have some sort of inspection stamps on it. Also interesting is that the steel is just as pitted in the part of the blade covered by the guard as it is in the exposed part.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Member
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Olomouc
Posts: 1,708
|
![]()
I'm not well enough versed in these briquette blades to say if any series were produced without proof marks.
However on the pitting, this isn't a massive surprise, given the relatively recently hilting compared to the likely age of the blade. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Member
Join Date: Nov 2013
Posts: 456
|
![]()
I've been looking at pictures of briquets and it seems like every country under the sun made them for 150+ years. Most have inspection marks but some don't. From viewing threads about them on other boards I get the impression there's no way to ID a blade that isn't marked, especially since the original European hilt is missing.
What's odd is that you'd expect a blade from that part of Africa to be French, but French briquet blades seem to always be stamped. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 | |
Member
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Olomouc
Posts: 1,708
|
![]() Quote:
![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|