![]() |
|
![]() |
#1 |
Arms Historian
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Route 66
Posts: 10,192
|
![]()
I think the Sierra Leone and generally those West African regions are most likely. The blade indeed appears to be a European hanger blade, probably quite old, possibly late 18th c.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 | |
Member
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Olomouc
Posts: 1,708
|
![]() Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Member
Join Date: Nov 2013
Posts: 456
|
![]()
Thanks both. I've been looking at the blade closely to see if there are any faint markings that might provide a hint, but so far nothing. They may be hidden by the hilt. There is an "S" shaped thing but I think it's just a flaw in the steel rather than a mark.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Member
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Olomouc
Posts: 1,708
|
![]()
I would agree that's not a mark but rather just a surface scratch or aberration in the steel.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
Arms Historian
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Route 66
Posts: 10,192
|
![]()
I agree on that 'mark' Iain. On the blade, it seems like a simple and 'wedge' type, and as Blue Lander noted, perhaps it may indeed be a briquette. I have seen many with these kinds of blades, and that would probably bring the blade into 19th century....these were around pretty much through the century.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 | |
Member
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Olomouc
Posts: 1,708
|
![]() Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
Member
Join Date: Nov 2013
Posts: 456
|
![]()
I was oiling the blade up when I noticed the guard felt quite loose. I applied the slightest amount of pressure and the guard separated in two, revealing the base of the blade. It does appear to have a very small ricasso, although I still don't see any identifying marks. I'm going to clean the exposed part of the blade with mineral oil to see if anything pops out before I re attach the top of the guard.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|