![]() |
|
![]() |
#1 |
(deceased)
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Portugal
Posts: 9,694
|
![]()
... And if you keep on digging, you end up finding something. Master Sacchi is not such an unknown smith ... maybe good enough to have his name forged by less famous rivals, a custom often followed in the period.
http://www.weapons-universe.com/Swor...aissance.shtml QUOTING ...Sword blades were manufactured in Toledo and Valencia (Spain), Solingen and Passau (Germany), and Milan and Brescia (Italy). They were sold as unhilted blades and then hilted locally at their eventual destinations throughout Europe. Some blades are marked by their maker, although many are plain. Notable bladesmiths’ names include Piccinino, Caino, Sacchi and Ferrara from Italy, .Johannes, Wundes and Tesche (Germany) and Hernandez (Spain).. Respected names were often stamped on blades by lesser-known rivals to enhance the value of an inferior sword. . Last edited by fernando; 23rd April 2014 at 12:58 PM. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Member
Join Date: Feb 2011
Posts: 47
|
![]()
Wow!!!!thank you all guys for that info....i forgot to post the other side of the blade, that bears the name ROMANNA. The blade is of very good quality sharp, light and flexible...
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Member
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Olomouc
Posts: 1,717
|
![]()
Great image Fernando.
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Arms Historian
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Route 66
Posts: 10,281
|
![]()
Outstanding Nando!!! I did not 'excavate' my copy of Gyngell, which is in one of the deeper strata here in the bookmobile , under the bed
![]() All the best, Jim |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
(deceased)
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Portugal
Posts: 9,694
|
![]()
But you know, one thing is the smith's name, another thing is the genuineness of the mark.
You would have to check other swords made by Sacchi, to conclude whether the mark in this one belongs to him or if we are facing one of countless signature copies. This because the lettering doesn't look like a keen job to me in the context and i wonder about the double L ROMANNA term; one of these popular allusions, not exclusive of this smith ? But don't pay much attention to my remarks, Skarts ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
Member
Join Date: Feb 2011
Posts: 47
|
![]()
Thank you Fernando!!! The name is Scacchi and i dont know if you noticed the stamp. It is a cross with two tails. I have seen it in other Italian blades. If it is an original master blade that would be lovely. However it is a nice blade and could be slight inferior than an original signed blade.
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
Arms Historian
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Route 66
Posts: 10,281
|
![]()
I think it is important to remember that misspellings and variations in marks etc. can have many explanations. Many 'masters' had ever expanding workshops in order to meet the demand for their products as their prowess and renown became widely known . This kind of thing accounts for many of the wildly varied and sometimes almost indiscernible 'running wolf' marks. These were often added by various workers and apprentices in shops. It is much the same with spellings, many workers were of course not literate and made these kinds of errors in transcribing markings of names or inscriptions.
It is often the case that misspelling and improper usage often point to Solingen interpretations, which is what led me to that assumption originally . I think the main thing is that the conception of having a 'signed' blade is pretty hard to prove considering the volume of swords produced in many workshops; the use of spurious marks and signatures by other makers using them as quality signatures etc Case in point 'ANDREA FERARA', Allegedly this 16th century Belluno maker actually existed, but there are many legends and misperceptions, compounded by the fact that he could not himself have produced blades in several countries over 250 years! |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|