![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
![]() |
#18 | |
Member
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Olomouc
Posts: 1,717
|
![]() Quote:
It is always difficult to convince someone who has a piece in hand if their own opinion is already fixed. I agree with what the other posters in this thread have said that there is not an Arab description. This is not, in my opinion, an object of antiquity and could well be a Chinese product as suggested by other posters. The other possibility is that this is a European reproduction, however would not likely make it particularly old either, at the oldest perhaps a late 19th century decorative item. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
|
|