![]() |
|
|||||||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
|
|
#1 |
|
(deceased)
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Bavaria, Germany - the center of 15th and 16th century gunmaking
Posts: 4,310
|
More detailed views.
m Last edited by Matchlock; 12th December 2013 at 08:11 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
(deceased)
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Bavaria, Germany - the center of 15th and 16th century gunmaking
Posts: 4,310
|
Three more, and two images of a ca. 1550 Nuremberg arquebus with much the same lock mechanism; the latter are almost 30 years old, so please be tolerant.
![]() At bottom, I enclosed some views of ca. 1566-1570's Styrian double-tinderlock mechanism (tillerlock and snapping tinderlock) calivers in the Landeszeughaus Graz; they all feature the downward bent petronel buttstock the lower end of which was completely encompassed by the right hand and held in front of the arquebusier's breast when firing. m Last edited by Matchlock; 13th December 2013 at 09:53 AM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Member
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: Netherlands
Posts: 543
|
Hermann historica sold one of these locks on theire 66th auction lot 263.
The "stellschraube" is broken, but it looks like the real deal? Or is this something else?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
(deceased)
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Bavaria, Germany - the center of 15th and 16th century gunmaking
Posts: 4,310
|
Hi Marcus,
I am quite at a loss: Hermann Historica never had an auction n. '263', and the mechanism you scanned is not included either in their sales no. 62 or 63. Apart from that it is a completely average matchlock of the 1640's (!), the wingnut (Klemmschraube) missing from the serpentine, but without any additional safety wingnut to the sear. Please see my thread A Matchlock Chronology, ca. 1520-1720 for a very similar mechanism of ca. 1640, the ends of the lockplate also triangular: http://www.vikingsword.com/vb/showth...ock+chronology Best, Michael |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Member
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: Netherlands
Posts: 543
|
Auction 66, lot number 263.
There is a screw left of the Mark/stamp which has been broken off ? Or is this just the pivet point for the lock?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
(deceased)
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Bavaria, Germany - the center of 15th and 16th century gunmaking
Posts: 4,310
|
My fault, sorry, Marcus.
I have been working on and for the forum since 9 in the morning (it's an hour to midnight now).It is a screw but entering from the inside and holding the sear in place; it is not broken off and it does not have a safety function. Each conventional matchlock must have this screw, the earlier ones (like the two I presented here) show rivets in this place. Again my matchlock chronology 1520-1720 should help settle all questions regarding that earliest and simplest of all igniting mechanisms. m |
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Member
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: Netherlands
Posts: 543
|
My excitement came into the way of fact as well. Though i ussually don't see this screw stick out so far, i should have know it to be just the sear/pivot point of the lock mechanism
|
|
|
|
![]() |
|
|