![]() |
|
![]() |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
|
![]() |
#1 | |
Member
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 1,740
|
![]() Quote:
![]() Regards |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Member
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 278
|
![]()
Sorry, the museum says..a newly made keris but interesting motifs.
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Member
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 1,740
|
![]()
Hi Mykeris,
Thank you for sharing the bad news with us ![]() Regards |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Member
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 278
|
![]()
Hi Jean,
Just got this verbal news from the museum, they retracted their earlier comments. After undergone several tests, the blade is of extra-ordinary archaic buda forms with wayang motifs. Blade thickness is considered unordinary-very thin through out perhaps one of its kind in this form. The hilt is new and mendak comes from the 1800s era. rgrds, ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
Member
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 6,989
|
![]()
Very interesting.
Do you know what tests were done, and how? The qualifications of the testers? Or are we just looking at an opinion? Thank you. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
Member
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 278
|
![]()
Thanks Alan.
I would not question museum's standard. tq ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
Member
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 6,989
|
![]()
Thank you for your enlightening response.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|