Ethnographic Arms & Armour
 

Go Back   Ethnographic Arms & Armour > Discussion Forums > Ethnographic Weapons
FAQ Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old 11th April 2013, 03:19 PM   #1
Gavin Nugent
Member
 
Gavin Nugent's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 2,818
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Matt Easton
To put a cap on this thread - I now know for absolute certain that this sword was made for an officer serving in Sarawak.

So the natural assumption must be that this scabbard was made in Sarawak, replacing the original leather and brass scabbard that Wilkinson would have provided with the sword.

Cheers,
Matt
Don't shelve it just yet Matt.

What was the Absolute proof you now have? I am sure others would also want to know.

Gavin
Gavin Nugent is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11th April 2013, 07:08 PM   #2
Matt Easton
Member
 
Matt Easton's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Surrey, Great Britain.
Posts: 53
Default

Hi Gavin,
The Wilkinson records show that the sword was sold to Oliver St John, who was the postmaster of Sarawak (presumably he ordered it for a Sarawak officer). Added to this, the Wilkinson records also show the designs for a Sarawak sword belt buckle and blade etching, both which show the S with oak leaves motif and state that they war for Sarawak.
Regards,
Matt
Matt Easton is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 03:47 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Posts are regarded as being copyrighted by their authors and the act of posting material is deemed to be a granting of an irrevocable nonexclusive license for display here.