![]() |
|
![]() |
#1 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Greenville, NC
Posts: 1,854
|
![]()
I wonder if this massive old blade may have been remounted at some point in its life. Some of the decorative carving seems a little fresh, especially when compared to the other example. The tang is sticking out quite a bit as well. It would seem with such a massive heavy blade you would want every inch of the tang braced in some way, especially if it were going to be done with decorative wire and bands.
I agree with Battara...this is a "look at how big mine is" panabas, designed to impress more than employ. It certainly is no jungle cleaver, at least not dressed out as it is. Regardless, magnificent, eye-catching example! |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 | |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 1,018
|
![]() Quote:
I think this type/shape of Panabas blades with the protrusions nearest the tang is supposed to be set this way with the tang sticking out a bit. See the other 3 examples of Panabas' with the similar blade shape. The size is imposing, I wonder how tall the fellow was that wielded this piece. I guessing this was probably made in the first third of the 20th century. Thoughts? |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
EAAF Staff
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Louisville, KY
Posts: 7,270
|
![]()
Perhaps when it comes to the socket, this is a style for this type of panabas.....
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Member
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 2,818
|
![]()
Congrats
![]() It is well known that there were giants of men amongst the Moro warriors....status, perhaps so, much in the same way the size of the Pershing Kampy appears to be ![]() Gavin |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 748
|
![]() ![]() ![]() best regards carlos |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 | |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Greenville, NC
Posts: 1,854
|
![]() Quote:
I had seen some of the carved swirls nearer the hilt and thought thay looked fresh, but clearly I was wrong. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|