![]() |
![]() |
#14 | |
Member
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 285
|
![]() Quote:
we must not consider the sandangan as a guide to 'tangguh' lets just observe the keris. Let us see the gandik, its tall and "rubuh"....which mean this gandik must have a "kembang kacang''. and it have kembang kacang indeed. the question is " should it be POGOG or the normal shape?" the front wadidang looks funny to me. I can imagine if only it has a normal shape of kembang kacang. it would be much-much better in shape. specially tha shape of front wadidang. its quite common that kembang kacang pogog would be a so nicely combined with a straight gandik. in other hand...kembang kacang pogog and a gandik rubuh (sloping gandik) like this one is a terrible combination. then we can see the ODO-ODO. it looks quite tall since the sogokan is also very very deep, tall, and looks wide also. the blade is thin so the odo-odo looks tall. we can say that since the blade it self looks clean, (needs warangan). but we can see the pamor is applied in a thin layers. this style of pamor application is very balinese . how about the greneng? is it indicate an original shape or not? in my opinion its fine alright. its still original in shape. honestly, I dont see any thing at all that indicate this keris revers to blambangan. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
|
|