|
9th September 2012, 02:09 PM | #1 | |
Member
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Maryland, USA
Posts: 112
|
Quote:
Thank you for pointing to that most interesting and educational thread! Dan |
|
9th September 2012, 03:01 PM | #2 |
Member
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Germany, Dortmund
Posts: 8,781
|
Beautiful keris most probable Sumatra Riau Bugis type. Top cross piece from the sheath are from kemuning wood and stem from angsana wood IMHO.
Agree with Gustav about the turn of the handle. Have handled as well some Bugis type keris where the handle was fixed in this position. |
11th September 2012, 06:50 PM | #3 |
Member
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Wickford, UK
Posts: 54
|
Thanks for the feedback all.
Does anyone have a feel for the age of this item? I have seen a similar example of the form dating from the early 20th Century so that would be my best guess. |
13th September 2012, 09:30 AM | #4 | |
Member
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 3,254
|
Quote:
(I reckon that for the blade 19th c. might be also a reasonable guess.) Regards, Kai |
|
13th September 2012, 09:43 AM | #5 |
Member
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 1,249
|
When we are moving outside of Java with it's Tangguh system (which actually also isn't an age estimation system), the age estimation becomes more and more subjective (will say without a firm ground).
I feel, regarding this blade, age (19. or beginning of 20.cent) doesn't influence the value much. If we are looking to keris, quality in most cases an average western collector comes in touch is more important then age. |
13th September 2012, 06:35 PM | #6 | |
Member
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Wickford, UK
Posts: 54
|
Quote:
I have posted the link to the site this is shown on in one of my earlier posts above. By the way, the dealer gave me full permission to post the photos here and asked if I could find out the age for him since Eastern weapons are outside his area of expertise. |
|
14th September 2012, 01:23 AM | #7 | |
Member
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 3,254
|
Quote:
Even if the suggested dating of this second keris could be substantiated, I don't think them to be similar enough to base a dating for the first keris on. BTW, while I don't neccessarily disagree with the dating in the given example, I would very much caution against taking estimated age of keris on most, if not just about all, websites/books for granted. I'm with Gustav - it doesn't really matter wether this keris blade is antique or vintage (or wether the fittings may be a bit later since these get replaced fairly regularly while a keris is being worn in a tropical climate). Regards, Kai |
|
14th September 2012, 08:05 AM | #8 |
Member
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Wickford, UK
Posts: 54
|
Thanks Kai, I'm learning a lot from knowledgeable fellows such as yourself!
|
|
|